From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martin@vista-silicon.com (javier Martin) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:04:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] i.MX27: Add clock support for SAHARA2. In-Reply-To: <20130311074206.GY1906@pengutronix.de> References: <1362137873-8827-1-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <1362137873-8827-2-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <20130304075306.GA1906@pengutronix.de> <20130310083401.GB10448@gondor.apana.org.au> <20130310230856.GU1906@pengutronix.de> <20130311011926.GA14930@gondor.apana.org.au> <20130311074206.GY1906@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 11 March 2013 08:42, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:19:26AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:08:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:34:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/ >> > > > > >> > > > > So the change above becomes unnecessary >> > > > >> > > > Very good. Then this patch can be safely dropped. >> > > >> > > So should I take this patch or not? >> > >> > This clk patch, no. The sahara patch, yes, if it is fine for you. >> >> But will the second patch work fine without the first? > > It will work once a device is registered. The necessary clocks for it > will be provided by the devicetree then. As Sascha stated you can safely drop this first patch: [PATCH v3 1/2] i.MX27: Add clock support for SAHARA2. And merge the second one: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: sahara: Add driver for SAHARA2 accelerator. Regards. -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n 39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain +34 942 25 32 60 www.vista-silicon.com