Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] ipmi: Allow raw access to KCS devices

From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	 OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>,
	 devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>,
	 linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	 "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Avi Fishman <avifishman70@gmail.com>,
	 Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>,
	 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	 "Chia-Wei, Wang" <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] ipmi: Allow raw access to KCS devices
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 04:07:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACPK8Xc5HC7TZ6cUDH6+uHQO1LQCZE0YeENua1sE8nDXs0R2mg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ff29d26-543a-4790-abb4-ebaa3f8d0265@www.fastmail.com>

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 23:47, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 21:44, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:27:46AM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:

> > > > 1. It begins with patches 1-5 put together by Chia-Wei, which I've
> > > > rebased on v5.12-rc2. These fix the ASPEED LPC bindings and other
> > > > non-KCS LPC-related ASPEED device drivers in a way that enables the
> > > > SerIRQ patches at the end of the series. With Joel's review I'm hoping
> > > > these 5 can go through the aspeed tree, and that the rest can go through
> > > > the IPMI tree.

> > > >
> > > > Please review!
> > >
> > > Unfortunately the cover letter got detached from the rest of the series.
> > >
> > > Any chance you can take a look at the patches?
> >
> > There were some minor concerns that were unanswered, and there really
> > was no review by others for many of the patches.
>
> Right; I was planning to clean up the minor concerns once I'd received
> some more feedback. I could have done a better job of communicating
> that :)

I'll merge the first five through the aspeed tree this coming merge
window. We have acks from the relevant maintainers.

Arnd: would you prefer that this come as it's own pull request, or as
part of the device tree branch?

Andrew, Corey: once I've got my pull requests out I'll look at
reviewing the rest of the series. Perhaps it would pay to re-send that
hunk of patches Andrew with the nits fixed?

Cheers,

Joel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel