From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:08:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5250 SoC specific data
In-Reply-To: <1362568712-13586-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
References: <1362568712-13586-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
 <1362568712-13586-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ37FutKzwSSF7w425Nh=jPUU-FXf48HPs3oUXO9sJ0oA@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Thomas Abraham
<thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:

> Add Samsung Exynos5250 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for
> all platforms based on Exynos5250.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

So shall I merge these three patches to the pinctrl tree or not?

Yours,
Linus Walleij