From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:58:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] ARM: remove extra timer-sp control register clearing
In-Reply-To: <1363820051-24428-3-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
References: <1363820051-24428-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <1363820051-24428-3-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZLn=KjJisPTN2eHn64UuaZvpBDDhmeqQXF-TVS8VZ7pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> The timer-sp initialization code clears the control register before
> initializing the timers, so every platform doing this is redundant.
>
> For unused timers, we should not care what state they are in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
(...)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_ap.c b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_ap.c
> index ea96144..4cb322d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_ap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_ap.c
> @@ -643,10 +643,6 @@ static void __init ap_timer_init(void)
>         clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>         rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
>
> -       writel(0, TIMER0_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -       writel(0, TIMER1_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -       writel(0, TIMER2_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -

As noted this is not an init function for timer-sp.c so please drop this
hunk of the patch. Maybe this zeroing is pointless but that would
be a separate patch that I can test.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
> index 2b0db82..c68e7d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>  #include <mach/platform.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
>  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> -#include <asm/hardware/arm_timer.h>

What doe this change has to do with $SUBJECT?

>  #include <asm/hardware/icst.h>
>
>  #include <mach/cm.h>
> @@ -267,7 +266,6 @@ static void __init cp_of_timer_init(void)
>         base = of_iomap(node, 0);
>         if (WARN_ON(!base))
>                 return;
> -       writel(0, base + TIMER_CTRL);
>         sp804_clocksource_init(base, node->name);
>
>         err = of_property_read_string(of_aliases,
> @@ -279,7 +277,6 @@ static void __init cp_of_timer_init(void)
>         if (WARN_ON(!base))
>                 return;
>         irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> -       writel(0, base + TIMER_CTRL);
>         sp804_clockevents_init(base, irq, node->name);
>  }
>
> @@ -510,10 +507,6 @@ static void __init intcp_init_irq(void)
>
>  static void __init cp_timer_init(void)
>  {
> -       writel(0, TIMER0_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -       writel(0, TIMER1_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -       writel(0, TIMER2_VA_BASE + TIMER_CTRL);
> -
>         sp804_clocksource_init(TIMER2_VA_BASE, "timer2");
>         sp804_clockevents_init(TIMER1_VA_BASE, IRQ_TIMERINT1, "timer1");
>  }

The rest of the changes to integrator_cp.c looks OK...

Yours,
Linus Walleij