linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] pci, thunder: Add PCIe host controller devicetree bindings
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:16:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4oFLKbtddzVoXBN-1dXZn5C4pmzY_QiFMwV+RWtmtjiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8057985.kyfsioKAVy@wuerfel>

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 00:37:00 Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 24 September 2014 23:34:04 Sunil Kovvuri wrote:

>> >> All on-board PCI devices connected to this PCI controller have fixed resources
>> >> and doesn't have to be allocated/reassigned. Some of these devices are
>> >> SRIOV based.
>> >
>> > I think you need to mark the ones that are nonrelocatable with flag
>> > 0x80000000, otherwise the PCI core might decide to reassign them.
>>
>> Is this flag part of DT pci node properties ?
>> I am using IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED flag. Its there in other patches of
>> the same series.
>
> Ah, right. I checked the source code again and it seems that we don't handle
> this right at the moment. I think a range that has the nonrelocatable
> flag set should be used for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED mappings without any
> host specific code, but that needs to be implemented in common code.

What connection do you envision between nonrelocatable ranges and
IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED?  I don't know what a nonrelocatable range is,
but for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED, all I intend is that the PCI core should
not try to assign a different address, e.g., because the BAR is
read-only or because it's a legacy IDE/VGA/etc. range for which there
is no BAR at all.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-25 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24 15:37 [PATCH 0/6] pci, thunder: Add Cavium Thunder PCIe host controller Robert Richter
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] pci, thunder: Add support for " Robert Richter
2014-09-24 16:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 16:49     ` Will Deacon
2014-09-30  9:14       ` Sunil Kovvuri
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] GICv3: Add ITS entry to THUNDER dts Robert Richter
2015-06-25 23:19   ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2015-06-26  9:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci, thunder: Add PCIe host controller devicetree bindings Robert Richter
2014-09-24 16:06   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 18:04     ` Sunil Kovvuri
2014-09-24 18:34       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 19:07         ` Sunil Kovvuri
2014-09-25  7:31           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 16:16             ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-09-25 19:26               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 20:10                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-25 20:22                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 20:49                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-26 18:26     ` Rob Herring
2014-09-30  9:11       ` Sunil Kovvuri
2014-10-07 14:27     ` Robert Richter
2014-10-07 15:01       ` Liviu Dudau
2014-10-08  8:49         ` Robert Richter
2014-10-08 16:44           ` Liviu Dudau
2014-10-09  6:23             ` Robert Richter
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] pci, thunder: Document " Robert Richter
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64, defconfig: Enable PCI Robert Richter
2014-09-24 16:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 16:26     ` Robert Richter
2014-09-24 17:10       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-24 18:40         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25  9:35           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-25 10:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 15:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] pci, thunder: Enable Cavium Thunder PCIe host controller Robert Richter
2014-09-24 17:12   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAErSpo4oFLKbtddzVoXBN-1dXZn5C4pmzY_QiFMwV+RWtmtjiQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).