[PATCH v6 4/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800

[gautam.vivek@samsung.com (Vivek Gautam)]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com> wrote:
> adding Julius here,

i think i had missed adding Julius for this entire series :-(
I should be more careful with the CC list in future.
Added his chromium id, since that seems to be more active.

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:19:50AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:53:09AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:01:19PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> >> >> > Don't we have phy_power_on()
>>> >> >> > for that ? It looks like you could just as well do this from
>>> >> >> > phy_power_on() ?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> No, unfortunately keeping these calibration settings in phy_power_on()
>>> >> >> doesn't help, since we need to do this after XHCI reset has happened.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > teach xHCI about PHYs ?
>>> >>
>>> >> sorry i couldn't understand you here.
>>> >> Aren't we trying to do the same with Heikki's patch about dwc3 :
>>> >> [PATCH 6/6] usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
>>> >>
>>> >> and the 2nd patch in this series :
>>> >> [PATCH v6 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Get PHYs for xhci's hcds
>>> >>
>>> >> Is there something else that is expected ?
>>> >
>>> > right, use that to call phy_init() at the right time, then you need to
>>> > add a new ->calibrate() method which, likely, will only be used by you
>>> > ;-)
>>>
>>> so you mean, the xhci should itself call phy_init() at a time suitable,
>>> so that ->calibrate() is not required at all ?
>>>
>>> i think you meant there - "then you __do not__ need to
>>
>> right :-)
>
> alright, i will prepare a patch for the suggested change.
>
> But AFAI remember we had discussion for this patch in earlier version,
> and Julius suggested to use a generic approach for such
> change wherein other users in future may be able to use the
> facility.
> Julius any thoughts about the change suggested by Felipe.




-- 
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India