From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EB0C433E0 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 04:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0BD206E3 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 04:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="1eNZwwOu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=0x0f.com header.i=@0x0f.com header.b="ibIWiXjG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED0BD206E3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=0x0f.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=J4Ivo4sWqTJLTZYeEEuNZ92bdLTKBbRvUtWs7H83N30=; b=1eNZwwOun6TDLiHDb+veNcaBZ YMypwXZ2r09A7HBTF7HB8JxxTq+OFf+DbqTKtKXimA0Q4s/rD/NjIyvtX7i5oc063Chh8l8MkOIEE k1AVwj2lg/CCqrm2sJUWMrs7G1TB/vurHwjFHn8rrbPG1/0x6Olmv4KMpk+gytXDwwZIFvn/ONI1k 3/KaVoVGvTIUA6e4ENfuxVV9yuLQFvBlvDb0JECsylPiluAHucdSRP8IsnRnqrML/CZSVVDN1TMkT a4qEBpDug0wWsarkV9wxUUmBaoC9YsPQDedh8X9ggNtwV0XxrJ5rHuXLnL7VappCq27YQq6w77dV2 XfT9K0rGw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jzC30-0002gq-AM; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 04:44:34 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jzC2v-0002g8-S8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2020 04:44:31 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id 88so9969305wrh.3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=0x0f.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5VrwN5/UnygvMy3zMm6TjQrq+luQNTXvPZ+NbPuQVPA=; b=ibIWiXjGWI4kz9I5MrfgGQdY71Zw+k0eXM7gC5w5R+lLsuD/rVVn4l5bB7vbyRpgSF CV+8imaGR1JjGgXBgy9BLroi7X+UhQOc0W+LxYQAbq+YPThjVyOrAleyn+J44L5k/1pZ ATDUYH0iFCuMMtfyo4nNuUBNgpolxBm3o3+jo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5VrwN5/UnygvMy3zMm6TjQrq+luQNTXvPZ+NbPuQVPA=; b=ggvrHbYIVO8O/km5sACUpm5ZX+wcPC/YST4iwdLKiCthKUOD4pBnFk57sqQDM5yVGZ X/n7F9WNr5JXvd404NqylSKnOxW20f0mKS7JjPrUw0+wXilAwh0oj6RxWIHHaXWFvJBu +yXJJdiKaG9NTUTK4wHj8XHaONZYVmD48K2hgnFP5dF8ZXIq74iBYdqfcltwQOYKDyI2 M3iyBZr3A1rJR0sJ9T50SY9uOG9/tu+N4cijsuRzLAUg21CMWgvkl34bmcpuiwzsDBef Z4Ppdk8gP6Bqdc6XpIC6cCDuf3YEgEcTR/xQ+TqYxo9apNUrImC11oPXjru64cmOEzBL RiDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+0QmgeMZQbNHpJyKQzVAn4qVPISQA+12nchXKB9vIlKSc73E0 4B0utfhHuHXAKEQdZj1bubpx5lgd8BElu7Pzp34gsQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyibJBX0jw3LQVOdkevS7Z9trwmeRbeB+lDZ+bqAHr4vmhNL3sBrn1KJuO9i4ieIVDSG6EKmvewA3ljP/CM5q4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd91:: with SMTP id q17mr11312969wrj.5.1595652264082; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:44:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200710094544.430258-1-daniel@0x0f.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Palmer Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 13:44:13 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Initial MStar/Sigmastar ARMv7 SoC support To: Arnd Bergmann X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200725_004430_073783_204FB8EC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: DTML , Marc Zyngier , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Rob Herring , Willy Tarreau , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, Thanks. There is one small fix for the v5 set. One of the DTS file names got broken when I rebased on a different machine. I'll send a patch for that later today. Cheer, Daniel On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 23:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM Daniel Palmer wrote: > > > > This patch set adds initial support for MStar/Sigmastar's > > Armv7 based SoCs. There is just enough here to get to a shell > > with an initramfs but support for a lot of the hardware is > > in progress and will follow. > > > > MStar also shipped chips with MIPS cores and ARM9 etc which > > are incompatible so I've tried to make the distinction in the > > code that this is strictly for the Armv7 based chips. > > > > Sorry for the spamming this. I just really want to make some > > progress on this because I'm worried the other bits that are > > needed for these SoCs (Really old AT91 support in macb and > > the fotg210 usb host) will be lost or stop working in the meantime. > > This already happened in u-boot. > > Hi Daniel, > > I just found the series again after looking through some backlog, > and noticing I missed your submission from July 10. This looks > all good to me now, so I've merged the series into the arm/newsoc > branch that already contains added support for the keembay and > sparx5 SoCs. > > If you require any changes to this, please send incremental > patches against the soc tree, and submit it to soc@kernel.org > so it makes it gets into patchwork. > > Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel