Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add lock in mtk_rmw function.

From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org>
To: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	hui.liu@mediatek.com,
	"Eddie Huang (黃智傑)" <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	jg_poxu@mediatek.com, "Biao Huang" <biao.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"Hongzhou Yang" <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>,
	"Erin Lo (羅雅齡)" <erin.lo@mediatek.com>,
	"Sean Wang (王志亘)" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	seiya.wang@mediatek.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add lock in mtk_rmw function.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:05:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGp9Lzq+NQhguSoc5DE4kyUgi2uSNOkURuAeAFpGuizcaXUXew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210312063502.3685-2-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>

Hi Zhiyong,

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:35 PM Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> When multiple threads operate on the same register resource
> which include multiple pin, It will make the register resource
> wrong to control. So we add lock to avoid the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 4 ++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h | 2 ++
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c         | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 72f17f26acd8..fcf7c3eeee4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -58,10 +58,14 @@ void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
>  {
>         u32 val;
>
> +       mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
> +
>         val = mtk_r32(pctl, i, reg);
>         val &= ~mask;
>         val |= set;
>         mtk_w32(pctl, i, reg, val);
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
>  }
>
>  static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> index e2aae285b5fc..65eac708a3b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h
> @@ -251,6 +251,8 @@ struct mtk_pinctrl {
>         struct mtk_eint                 *eint;
>         struct mtk_pinctrl_group        *groups;
>         const char          **grp_names;
> +       /* lock pin's register resource to avoid multiple threads issue*/
> +       struct mutex lock;
>  };
>
>  void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> index da1f19288aa6..48e823f6d293 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
> @@ -970,6 +970,8 @@ int mtk_paris_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
>         hw->nbase = hw->soc->nbase_names;
>
> +       mutex_init(&hw->lock);
> +

Could you help add the mutex initialization into pinctrl-moore.c too?
and then the patch would look good to me.

>         err = mtk_pctrl_build_state(pdev);
>         if (err) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "build state failed: %d\n", err);
> --
> 2.18.0
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel