From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: illusionist.neo@gmail.com (Shubham Bansal)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:33:26 +0530
Subject: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKwTDYeNQggezzSKkFzZQkroC+6SdBB0qUKh5crfNk8PA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHgaXdKsO2xoKYp7g91g+n+d_1KHSSByLjzBB-WjVXSjhB7qxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170510.212952.1440495072777358778.davem@davemloft.net>
 <CAHgaXdK8LEEUPm4jTRRzCnjwdWAauHmmB=caZsSFY8MmStH89Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170510.215218.2185526627014393313.davem@davemloft.net>
 <CAHgaXdKZ_v+iO7uqEDx7PA7D+xcp1FngGvJ1SRSsGXNQ-iWWDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgaXdLJoVUXXGTYs7FYXay5wx=sA-O+=dYhX+r7AQT7vSNfGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5j+2q4Wwfhuk_DnDaV894A9ZOD=A_AvAU_OZG6KQv0_KMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgaXdL7GcVzs+ANPke_NywhcgHbe_fzi1sTDEy+Ni1-o82GYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <591A07A1.1030006@iogearbox.net>
 <CAHgaXdKKbRVSpX-036TXpV5z=1=QCnPoku0+CeHxHco8-aasPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5j+k+NMQGmmhuW-4pHFd6agfndJfxQ9k--h+ZpsDBVB8ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <8c53012b-cb81-5228-de79-f55457d1cf69@gmail.com>
 <CAHgaXdL2qReJF1Aw08k3C+OiC-3AOy3VeYmQ1Hs7vKcrfGQnvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5jKwTDYeNQggezzSKkFzZQkroC+6SdBB0qUKh5crfNk8PA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHgaXdKqt3mZmPG78w+4g_17D8EQoBgAZeuqM+MMsQg2f7apsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Kees,

I already have ARMv5 and ARMv6 code written. I just haven't tested it
yet. Should i send the patch with those as well ?

Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Shubham Bansal
> <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would post them as soon as I test them on ARMv5 and ARMv6. If you
>> can help me with that, please let me know.
>
> Please post what you have: it would be better to see what you've got
> now in case additional changes are needed so you don't have to do it
> again on v5 and v6. Also, it means other people with real v5 and v6
> hardware could test for you if they were so inclined, and you won't
> need to be blocked on doing the tests in qemu.
>
> You can send it as an "RFC" in the subject, just to make sure people
> know it's not considered fully done. :)
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security