From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E49C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25C62173B for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="E//zO+hn"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="c/T8D2EB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B25C62173B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zAPC/FmuyXPFuLtRqCVGNCz9s/uLdPwwGlwRWdYvkIw=; b=E//zO+hnBF6VVe VTJiiikMONm6my3nbQws9XlWd1xPQ8mUOlrc3h8goVrttvKfTShm/M+VQl//UKDq/b1mbIWSRKzFh WAsteobE3YICtGw1LnSUgIYtX4tM9Ctel7znEXNl0/5qjXIij/yyAHhvNZAFtKgdx9j97NvzrEZMk fIH/TzrlujfkgtRApKmI6FFG+5g7VR+VB0Sthf2NQsRv7z6TqX7UaIDx4oLptSZG355qErVI/43CP nDI15XEIVANXAp6gjDUvF8lRkU7Q5qJ7Qq8JBLhe1LdJNcI2iosQ+6FiXKvhawDEYYJJ1GMrGDmdI c5FBtav7sq5CL7wZ/Kkw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghXGS-0003y6-Qy; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:08:40 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ghXGP-0003x8-0U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:08:38 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id q1so5096570pfi.5 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 02:08:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KsrA9e/YTY8VQx623WU53BOyh7sF7fPNsmII8U736wk=; b=c/T8D2EBoGXlytaOCb3o3IkZpl0F3ysP5Iuy+oaORbZJvqL/rgNd/yDbBYyskw/wH9 ovoAB//aEQhWx9uP9GVy4/uGcSDa1ovU6Lr57yKsFAqhoriHg2Zi7aUZ+BbSk5E+qzio 1BkEC5eatIwR1kaXowazAeQNx82MBIZYXtsoYZ7Zd6dScbUkbCJxhTq4t+Jugeersg+c pIs7e6xoDR/ZI6rBfOzCnCqXIdMM0iuQYQVBESkR27NF8K1GfkSwZ2olycyk03bOW038 H6RAcS8hcLY7MKAN1OWp2BMOZ3o4OHljVaXFU589gVgxC8QtXmFtHeAOOSgsibT+F87h UoCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KsrA9e/YTY8VQx623WU53BOyh7sF7fPNsmII8U736wk=; b=tLmQO23DGTn8WeVfAI4yVEFGY1H6SIBX9cAfrCBSxLTxfvJt1fMvaOq7JLZiP7xE5e iMQ5HoQUTn/BgAjNKaNuxYaSHiaRJPRLsvy+2EIW7OqXJ29Jj8Bw61dPlNSIfDFoFac6 7Li5ov7XdX9Us67pNDwWJf0N/8seNdbYQ6l/CdAnFPr8ChoyNLH2ijP1h+OgbVxleEu3 vy9q+TXGZhy66APu9VRknc90l14Ks63sNZlKNrfrnB37xf2BDgJw2rVTOZj3BSd/waoJ N+jWkrWm6J1bcJR2lg85kHzHAto5urrvOKcfhh+GIxP/7Vza8ZHET0Ma5p2FAFMQxTwO p2pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfPBtxWEGvqlhRP9v56UObaAAqCYyLfW0ICEMc6DrhjKHT9Izie 07PYkGFxTV/rUaYpJPmRdi9HR4Uvm5BdDDLfTWA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4rBVq+3np+gX1aEH+u8PCBbjM6K/wi/3UCkYIn92/TQ+l0M7seYzA3jkgwQwdq+Q/kANsj5RNS7EdbORgXOzI= X-Received: by 2002:a63:20e:: with SMTP id 14mr6585701pgc.161.1547114914523; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 02:08:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190108175818.705110-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> <3b9c5e7e35ae25316bf4551ebf7ae21238d64f03.camel@v3.sk> In-Reply-To: <3b9c5e7e35ae25316bf4551ebf7ae21238d64f03.camel@v3.sk> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:08:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Add support for OLPC XO 1.75 Embedded Controller To: Lubomir Rintel X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190110_020837_085401_AEBF8AFC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree , James Cameron , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" , Russell King , Platform Driver , Rob Herring , linux-arm Mailing List , Pavel Machek , Sebastian Reichel , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:37 PM Lubomir Rintel wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 13:15 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:58 PM Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > Also, the 01/15 patch has been added to allow the module to provide > > > a > > > reboot handler. Patch 15/15 depends on it. > > > > Isn't it a quite big distance between provider and consumer? > > Especially taking into consideration concerns about patch 1 which > > blocks the series. > > Perhaps you may drop it as a patch 1 and do something on top of patch > > 15 as feature extension? > > Yes, that is a good idea. I'll do so when I submit a new version of the > set (in few days' time). > > I think the battery part can be split from the EC part too. Would that > be a good idea to send them as separate patch sets next time? Yes, any independent porions can be send independently. It would speed up the review and applying process. > It seems > to me now that they probably ought to end up going in via different > trees (linux-power-supply vs linux-platform-drivers-x86). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel