From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E373DC31E49 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC9BD206E0 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="TF6Hl39R"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UyI997+Y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BC9BD206E0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xVGylzfbhiVJt/lI9dCs0b2vYhNMSAeDTN+T9KqgtCk=; b=TF6Hl39RXTQs/x hApKjPUw8135DVe7ucDxVagxlYS9xx6VVooXq3C7KddYOAxpYOPqeAH+rJ0dAWTHm22zlp410XPZ0 Ao3LtiAn6geMpySLg3QEUrXaIZwnWK61KEVPSfvd23eQY0cO/V43ABKVfhUlUlf5LMLZVObqTghbk 1E1XK0t3LqXIfG3wYtWT7wJyrlqnTIUOZDBgs9kC6tBf0m/yDWxiQhMKya+ik21jifEBD9TFtexoK F/53ZR69o2LmjDr78lPqmRdTUF/f4Yh74UWo5zJJzM/ean+ivzblAZgd7e1LOMxusqBKYhiIQE742 QeWBV7FOF89KZ7nUMxvg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdXWZ-00088M-76; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:09:03 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdXWW-00087y-2S for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:09:01 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0AA2206E0 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:08:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560938939; bh=KKvDwu+I2C1EkI77Psheqy+KG+PofgRIdUQS/TBoP64=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=UyI997+YuS2xnVlzmo5wKGej2P2Ay4u//ydoLlc1kZ+fFsr7x3BNtk8A0JXPQUdwq 4pAeNxELN5wdf1nLJ2k16enZ9Qqdvouqb+NrFeoPAcupz2NXKOVuidBk9XfNdANmvD dsWBqVIKvgVTu7uEGfO2DZbWBZVi572XTeuej3Do= Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id y17so11674601lfe.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 03:08:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXaRn5hhXQ3YZ2sQwrlPW1UTFQiQf+lrjLX3pOzApC540kloCkh ogI8OYK6p7h08fzuU7j/xAmYnYRs16SdeaiJIrI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8QzBck4su84jvxKMOq+3rh/piGZ7mbYb6bKW0wol+fphlsvgB8RGiXr8AGwrbQ/+jguHe0FrtMGU6s3ny/Uk= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4f50:: with SMTP id a16mr253073lfk.24.1560938936806; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 03:08:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190618190534.4951-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20190618190534.4951-2-krzk@kernel.org> <9d16d4f7-8353-e0f0-a005-1b04457d70f0@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <9d16d4f7-8353-e0f0-a005-1b04457d70f0@samsung.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:08:45 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFT 01/10] dt-bindings: gpu: mali: Add Samsung compatibles for Midgard and Utgard To: Marek Szyprowski X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190619_030900_146383_0AA0EF2C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , David Airlie , Catalin Marinas , Michael Turquette , Will Deacon , Tomasz Figa , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Joseph Kogut , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Chanwoo Choi , Kukjin Kim , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Inki Dae , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 12:01, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 2019-06-18 21:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Add vendor compatibles for specific implementation of Mali Utgard > > (Exynos3250, Exynos4-family) and Midgard (Exynos5433, Exynos7). > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt | 1 + > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > index e5ad3b2afe17..9b298edec5b2 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.txt > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Required properties: > > * which must be preceded by one of the following vendor specifics: > > + "allwinner,sun50i-h6-mali" > > + "amlogic,meson-gxm-mali" > > + + "samsung,exynos5433-mali" > > + "rockchip,rk3288-mali" > > + "rockchip,rk3399-mali" > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > index ae63f09fda7d..519018cb860b 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Required properties: > > + amlogic,meson8b-mali > > + amlogic,meson-gxbb-mali > > + amlogic,meson-gxl-mali > > + + samsung,exynos3250-mali > I would prefer 'samsung,exynos4-mali', because historically Exynos4 was > the first SoC with Mali400 and such prefix is already used for many hw > blocks. Then maybe samsung,exynos4210-mali so it will not be confused with Exynos4415? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel