linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Allwinner H6 SPDIF support
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:45:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJiuCceYDnyxRLLLLy6Dn6DLTZ+NmSaUnoX1Vmzvgiy0XvF_Fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190715193842.GC4503@sirena.org.uk>

Hi,

Sorry, I just discovered that the ASoC patches have been merged into
the broonie and linus tree in 5.3.

I'm still quite new in the sending of patches to the Kernel but
souldn't be a ack or a mail sent to warn the sender when the series
are accepted?

Should 5/6/7 patches be picked by Sunxi maintainer?

Thanks,
Clément





On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 21:38, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm missing ACK from ASoC Maintainers patch 2-3-4.
> >
> > It's really small paches, if you could have a look at it.
>
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
>
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-10  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 20:06 [PATCH v4 0/7] Allwinner H6 SPDIF support Clément Péron
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: sound: sun4i-spdif: Add Allwinner H6 compatible Clément Péron
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] ASoC: sun4i-spdif: Move quirks to the top Clément Péron
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] ASoC: sun4i-spdif: Add TX fifo bit flush quirks Clément Péron
2019-05-28  9:12   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] ASoC: sun4i-spdif: Add support for H6 SoC Clément Péron
2019-05-28  9:13   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add SPDIF node for Allwinner H6 Clément Péron
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Enable SPDIF for Beelink GS1 Clément Péron
2019-05-27 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: defconfig: Enable Sun4i SPDIF module Clément Péron
2019-06-14  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Allwinner H6 SPDIF support Clément Péron
2019-07-15 19:21   ` Clément Péron
2019-07-15 19:38     ` Mark Brown
2019-08-10  8:45       ` Clément Péron [this message]
2019-08-12 11:01         ` Mark Brown
2019-08-12 12:10           ` Clément Péron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJiuCceYDnyxRLLLLy6Dn6DLTZ+NmSaUnoX1Vmzvgiy0XvF_Fw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=peron.clem@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).