linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinier Kuipers <kuipers.reinier@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RTC hctosys disabled for 32-bit systems
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:31:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKYb531CyL8XRVRcRN30cC3xRgsd-1FzXUeS7o2LiZqALJ42qw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello all,

I'm working to fix the y2038 issue for an existing sama5d3-based
product. This involves updating the kernel and glibc to appropriate
versions (5.10 and 2.35.1 respectively) and I got things running up to
a state where, from userspace, both date and hwclock commands have no
issue accepting dates beyond 2038. However, even with the RTC_HCTOSYS
and RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE options configured correctly, the RTC driver
fails to initialize the system clock at bootup.

Some digging in rtc/class.c::rtc_hctosys() indicates that
do_settimeofday64() is deliberately not executed on systems with
BITS_PER_LONG==32 and a second counter higher than INT_MAX. I assumed
that the work on 64-bits timestamps was already fully implemented for
32-bit systems as well, so my gut feel is that this
BITS_PER_LONG/INT_MAX check has become unnecessary. A test build with
these checks disabled results in correct time initialization at bootup
with, at a glance, no adverse effects. Does anybody here know whether
do_settimeofday64()  is robust on 32-bit systems or that the checks
are still required to prevent further breakage?

Kind regards,
Reinier

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-09-01 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 11:31 Reinier Kuipers [this message]
2022-09-01 11:55 ` RTC hctosys disabled for 32-bit systems Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-01 12:49   ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-09-01 13:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-01 13:46       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-09-01 15:48         ` [Y2038] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-01 16:02           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-09-01 20:33             ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-01 21:11               ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-09-02 15:24                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-09-01 13:57       ` Alexandre Belloni
2022-09-01 15:29         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKYb531CyL8XRVRcRN30cC3xRgsd-1FzXUeS7o2LiZqALJ42qw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kuipers.reinier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).