From: vincent.guittot@linaro.org (Vincent Guittot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtC02QMyA55zVr_MmVMi8h7UzB5SDmZvU2GUNx-VXj+hkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534937F0.3020702@arm.com>
On 12 April 2014 14:56, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>> This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset
>> [1].
>> I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
>> thing easier.
>> -configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset)
>> -update and consolidation of cpu_power
>> -tasks packing algorithm
>>
>> Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to
>> configure
>> the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level
>> like
>> the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM
>> architecture.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239
>> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449
>
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4:
>
> For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT
> machine):
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>
Thanks
> Cheers,
>
> -- Dietmar
>
>
>>
>> Change since v3:
>> - remove last patch which was adding SD_SHARE_POWER_DOMAIN for powerpc's
>> SMT
>> level
>>
>> Change since v2:
>> - remove patch 1 as it has been already applied to metag tree for v3.15
>> - updates some commit messages
>> - add new flag description in TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS description
>>
>> Change since v1:
>> - move sched_domains_curr_level back under #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> - use function pointer to set flag instead of a plain value.
>> - add list of tunable flags in the commit message of patch 2
>> - add SD_SHARE_POWER_DOMAIN flag for powerpc's SMT level
>>
>> Vincent Guittot (5):
>> sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition
>> sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table
>> sched: powerpc: create a dedicated topology table
>> sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain
>> sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table
>>
>> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 26 +++++
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h | 24 ----
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 31 +++--
>> arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 13 +--
>> arch/s390/kernel/topology.c | 20 ++++
>> arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h | 33 ------
>> include/linux/sched.h | 49 +++++++-
>> include/linux/topology.h | 128 +++-----------------
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 244
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 9 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 313 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-14 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 9:44 [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34 ` [PATCH] fix: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] sched: powerpc: " Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 11:54 ` [PATCH] fix: sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-04-18 11:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-04-11 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 11:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-23 14:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-23 15:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-24 7:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-24 12:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 7:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-04-25 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-25 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-12 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description Dietmar Eggemann
2014-04-14 7:29 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2014-04-15 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKfTPtC02QMyA55zVr_MmVMi8h7UzB5SDmZvU2GUNx-VXj+hkg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).