From: George Pee <georgepee@gmail.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shtuemov@linux.intel.com>,
Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Report support for optional ARMv8.2 half-precision floating point extension
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 08:34:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKj0CMv1EY5YCeQ4G6PnGP=XfELJkkN5BaN8W1TGe0fOTXfJBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f765da5c-d484-adf2-e1bb-77011780dc0b@arm.com>
Adding the hwcap was part of the diagnosis process-- I added it just
to make sure that the cpu in question supported the optional
extension.
It seems like it could be useful to be able to check for support in
/proc/cpuinfo.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:46 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-01 15:13, george pee wrote:
> > Report as fphp to be consistent with arm64
>
> Wasn't the original problem that the VFP support code doesn't understand
> the new FP16 instruction encodings, so in practice they don't actually
> work reliably? Exposing a hwcap to say they're functional doesn't
> inherently make them functional - if there is already another patch
> somewhere for that, it should be made clear that this depends on it.
>
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: george pee <georgepee@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> > arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
> > index 990199d8b7c6..f975845ce5d3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > #define HWCAP_IDIV (HWCAP_IDIVA | HWCAP_IDIVT)
> > #define HWCAP_LPAE (1 << 20)
> > #define HWCAP_EVTSTRM (1 << 21)
> > +#define HWCAP_FPHP (1 << 22)
> >
> > /*
> > * HWCAP2 flags - for elf_hwcap2 (in kernel) and AT_HWCAP2
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > index 1e8a50a97edf..6694ced0552a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -1249,6 +1249,7 @@ static const char *hwcap_str[] = {
> > "vfpd32",
> > "lpae",
> > "evtstrm",
> > + "fphp",
> > NULL
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> > index 2cb355c1b5b7..cef8c64ce8bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
> > @@ -831,6 +831,8 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void)
> >
> > if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0xf0000000) == 0x10000000)
> > elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_VFPv4;
> > + if ((fmrx(MVFR1) & 0x0f000000) == 0x03000000)
> > + elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_FPHP;
> > }
> > /* Extract the architecture version on pre-cpuid scheme */
> > } else {
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 14:13 [PATCH] Report support for optional ARMv8.2 half-precision floating point extension george pee
2022-09-09 11:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-09 13:35 ` George Pee
2022-09-09 12:46 ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-09 13:34 ` George Pee [this message]
2022-09-09 14:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-09 14:57 ` George Pee
2022-09-09 15:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-12 13:05 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-09-12 18:09 ` George Pee
2022-09-09 14:17 ` Robin Murphy
2022-09-09 14:54 ` George Pee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKj0CMv1EY5YCeQ4G6PnGP=XfELJkkN5BaN8W1TGe0fOTXfJBw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=georgepee@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=austindh.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shtuemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).