From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:12:33 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v9 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos
 platforms
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9ajCP85aWL8ke_2sZ0bNXYxPHOLDHMfTVG1F7Z1aMCAyNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1406707663-16656-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com>
 <53DA4F73.5040400@gmail.com>
 <CAJuA9ahoke1b+=TgJQ0tfb4dKh4QmT7w1PoLkB0pZueWr0Awkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJuA9ajCP85aWL8ke_2sZ0bNXYxPHOLDHMfTVG1F7Z1aMCAyNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKohpon2OqxtShjp8dE2qtukh6=2_v2B=neH+mvyFN9spq_56g@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 1 August 2014 00:04, Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com> wrote:
> You had acked the cpufreq related changes in  v7 of this series. But
> there were some changes in v8 and so I have not included your Ack for
> v8 and v9. Could you please have one more look at the patches 4/6 [1]
> and 5/6 [2] of this v9 series and let me know if it looks okay.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34865.html
> [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34864.html

Looks fine..

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>