From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:43:40 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 14/16] cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for Tegra124 In-Reply-To: <53D00A47.7050203@nvidia.com> References: <1405957142-19416-1-git-send-email-ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> <1405957142-19416-15-git-send-email-ttynkkynen@nvidia.com> <53CFA33F.6030307@nvidia.com> <53D00A47.7050203@nvidia.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 24 July 2014 00:47, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > It's this: > > +static int tegra124_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > [...] > + > + dfll_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(cpu_dev->of_node, "dfll"); > + if (IS_ERR(dfll_clk)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(dfll_clk); > + goto out_put_cpu_clk; > + } This would search for clocks passed via DT, right? Why would we get EPROBE_DEFER for that? Sorry for the stupid question. -- viresh