From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:22:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] add support for relative references in jump tables In-Reply-To: <20180919130803.GH24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180919065144.25010-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20180919130803.GH24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19 September 2018 at 15:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:51:35PM -0700, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> Ard Biesheuvel (8): >> kernel/jump_label: abstract jump_entry member accessors >> kernel/jump_label: implement generic support for relative references >> arm64/kernel: jump_label: switch to relative references >> x86: add support for 64-bit place relative relocations >> x86: jump_label: switch to jump_entry accessors >> x86/kernel: jump_table: use relative references >> jump_label: annotate entries that operate on __init code earlier >> jump_table: move entries into ro_after_init region >> >> Heiko Carstens (1): >> s390/jump_label: switch to relative references > > This all looks good to me; > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > Ingo, could you queue this? I wouldn't mind if these could go in for the next cycle if there are no remaining concerns. Thanks, Ard.