linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	"<netdev@vger.kernel.org>" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>"
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mwifiex PCI/wake-up interrupt fixes
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:45:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9OOzOxx0rTAZqM8r4q_hRmOp3b=KP7fwgNeiu67FCApA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190224140426.3267-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 at 15:08, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>
> For quite some time, I wondered why the PCI mwifiex device built in my
> Chromebook was unable to use the good old legacy interrupts. But as MSIs
> were working fine, I never really bothered investigating. I finally had a
> look, and the result isn't very pretty.
>
> On this machine (rk3399-based kevin), the wake-up interrupt is described as
> such:
>
> &pci_rootport {
>         mvl_wifi: wifi@0,0 {
>                 compatible = "pci1b4b,2b42";
>                 reg = <0x83010000 0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x00100000
>                        0x83010000 0x0 0x00100000 0x0 0x00100000>;
>                 interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>                 interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>                 pinctrl-names = "default";
>                 pinctrl-0 = <&wlan_host_wake_l>;
>                 wakeup-source;
>         };
> };
>
> Note how the interrupt is part of the properties directly attached to the
> PCI node. And yet, this interrupt has nothing to do with a PCI legacy
> interrupt, as it is attached to the wake-up widget that bypasses the PCIe RC
> altogether (Yay for the broken design!). This is in total violation of the
> IEEE Std 1275-1994 spec[1], which clearly documents that such interrupt
> specifiers describe the PCI device interrupts, and must obey the
> INT-{A,B,C,D} mapping. Oops!
>

The mapping of legacy PCIe INTx interrupts onto wired system
interrupts is a property of the PCIe host controller, not of a
particular PCIe device. So I would argue that the code is broken here
as well: it should never attempt to interpret 'interrupt' properties
at the PCI device level as having any bearing on how legacy interrupts
are routed.

> The net effect of the above is that Linux tries to do something vaguely
> sensible, and uses the same interrupt for both the wake-up widget and the
> PCI device. This doesn't work for two reasons: (1) the wake-up widget grabs
> the interrupt in exclusive mode, and (2) the PCI interrupt is still routed
> to the RC, leading to a screaming interrupt. This simply cannot work.
>
> To sort out this mess, we need to lift the confusion between the two
> interrupts. This is done by extending the DT binding to allow the wake-up
> interrupt to be described in a 'wake-up' subnode, sidestepping the issue
> completely. On my Chromebook, it now looks like this:
>
> &pci_rootport {
>         mvl_wifi: wifi@0,0 {
>                 compatible = "pci1b4b,2b42";
>                 reg = <0x83010000 0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x00100000
>                        0x83010000 0x0 0x00100000 0x0 0x00100000>;
>                 pinctrl-names = "default";
>                 pinctrl-0 = <&wlan_host_wake_l>;
>                 wake-up {
>                         interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
>                         interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>                         wakeup-source;
>                 };
>         };
> };
>
> The driver is then updated to look for this subnode first, and fallback to
> the original, broken behaviour (spitting out a warning in the offending
> configuration).
>
> For good measure, there are two additional patches:
>
> - The wake-up interrupt requesting is horribly racy, and could lead to
>   unpredictable behaviours. Let's fix that properly.
>
> - A final patch implementing the above transformation for the whole
>   RK3399-based Chromebook range, which all use the same broken
>   configuration.
>
> With all that, I finally have PCI legacy interrupts working with the mwifiex
> driver on my Chromebook.
>
> [1] http://www.devicetree.org/open-firmware/bindings/pci/pci2_1.pdf
>
> Marc Zyngier (4):
>   dt-bindings/marvell-8xxx: Allow wake-up interrupt to be placed in a
>     separate node
>   mwifiex: Fetch wake-up interrupt from 'wake-up' subnode when it exists
>   mwifiex: Flag wake-up interrupt as IRQ_NOAUTOEN rather than disabling
>     it too late
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: gru: Move wifi wake-up interrupt into its own
>     subnode
>
>  .../bindings/net/wireless/marvell-8xxx.txt    | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi   |  8 ++++---
>  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c   | 13 +++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-24 14:04 [PATCH 0/4] mwifiex PCI/wake-up interrupt fixes Marc Zyngier
2019-02-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings/marvell-8xxx: Allow wake-up interrupt to be placed in a separate node Marc Zyngier
2019-02-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] mwifiex: Fetch wake-up interrupt from 'wake-up' subnode when it exists Marc Zyngier
2019-02-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] mwifiex: Flag wake-up interrupt as IRQ_NOAUTOEN rather than disabling it too late Marc Zyngier
2019-02-26 23:31   ` Brian Norris
2019-02-26 23:34     ` Brian Norris
2019-04-04 10:22   ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-24 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: gru: Move wifi wake-up interrupt into its own subnode Marc Zyngier
2019-02-25 12:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-02-25 14:52   ` [PATCH 0/4] mwifiex PCI/wake-up interrupt fixes Marc Zyngier
2019-02-26 16:21     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-26 17:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-26 23:44         ` Brian Norris
2019-02-27  9:27           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-26 23:28 ` Brian Norris
2019-02-27 10:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-27 10:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-27 20:57       ` Brian Norris
2019-02-27 23:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-28  2:29           ` Brian Norris
2019-02-28 11:03             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-27 20:51     ` Brian Norris
2019-03-08  8:26 ` Kalle Valo
2019-03-08  9:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-08  9:36     ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu9OOzOxx0rTAZqM8r4q_hRmOp3b=KP7fwgNeiu67FCApA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=gbhat@marvell.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nishants@marvell.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).