linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,  Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com>,
	 "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	wqu@suse.com,  Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
	 Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,  Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:08:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXF_qYNahNJfgxz1EFy03AHGd_fHsMMd_PE0_sSPu61gcg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210614230457.752811-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com>

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 01:05, Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alexandru and Qu reported this resource allocation failure on
> ROCKPro64 v2 and ROCK Pi 4B, both based on the RK3399:
>
>   pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit]
>   pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>   pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
>   pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>
> "BAR 14" is the PCI bridge's 32-bit non-prefetchable window, and our
> PCI allocation code isn't smart enough to allocate it in a host
> bridge window marked as 64-bit, even though this should work fine.
>
> A DT host bridge description includes the windows from the CPU
> address space to the PCI bus space.  On a few architectures
> (microblaze, powerpc, sparc), the DT may also describe PCI devices
> themselves, including their BARs.
>
> Before 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource
> flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), of_bus_pci_get_flags() ignored
> the fact that some DT addresses described 64-bit windows and BARs.
> That was a problem because the virtio virtual NIC has a 32-bit BAR
> and a 64-bit BAR, and the driver couldn't distinguish them.
>
> 9d57e61bf723 set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for those 64-bit DT ranges, which
> fixed the virtio driver.  But it also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for host
> bridge windows, which exposed the fact that the PCI allocator isn't
> smart enough to put 32-bit resources in those 64-bit windows.
>
> Clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from host bridge windows since we don't need
> that information.
>
> Fixes: 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
> Reported-at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com/
> Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

> ---
> Hi,
>
> The patch is an updated version to fix the PCI allocation issues on
> RK3399 based platforms. Previous postings can be found at [0][1][2].
>
> The updated patch instead of clearing the 64-bit flag for
> non-prefetchable memory below 4GB does it unconditionally on the basis
> that PCI allocation logic cannot deal with the 64-bit flag (although
> it should be able to). The result is a simpler patch that restores the
> input to the allocation logic to be identical to before 9d57e61bf723.
>
> Tested locally on a RockPro64 on top of v5.13-rc6. Please consider
> merging.
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> Changes:
> v4:
>
> * Updated Patch 1 based on Bjorn's suggestion. Also dropped the
>   Tested-by tags due to the change of logic
> * Dropped patch 2 and 3 from the series as it's not critical to the
>   series
> * Dropped the device tree changes (Patch 4) as they are already queued
>   in the soc tree
>
> v3:
> * Improved commit log for clarity (Patch 1)
> * Added Tested-by tags
>
> v2:
> * Check ranges PCI / bus addresses rather than CPU addresses
> * (new) Restrict 32-bit size warnings on ranges that don't have the 64-bit attribute set
> * Refactor the 32-bit size warning to the range parsing loop. This
>   change also prints the warnings right after the window mappings are
>   logged.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210527150541.3130505-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210531221057.3406958-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210607112856.3499682-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com/
>
>  drivers/pci/of.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index 85dcb7097da4..a143b02b2dcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,8 @@ static int devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device *dev,
>                                 dev_warn(dev, "More than one I/O resource converted for %pOF. CPU base address for old range lost!\n",
>                                          dev_node);
>                         *io_base = range.cpu_addr;
> +               } else if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> +                       res->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>                 }
>
>                 pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res, res->start - range.pci_addr);
> --
> 2.30.2
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 23:04 [PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15  8:46 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-06-16 12:48   ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-15 21:18 ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16 12:53   ` Punit Agrawal
2021-06-16 14:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2021-06-16 23:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-18 13:55   ` Domenico Andreoli
2021-06-18 15:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMj1kXF_qYNahNJfgxz1EFy03AHGd_fHsMMd_PE0_sSPu61gcg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
    --cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).