Re: [PATCH 2/7] coresight: perf: Add "sinks" group to PMU directory

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 08:39, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:07:37PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Add a "sinks" directory entry so that users can see all the sinks
> > available in the system in a single place.  Individual sink are added
> > as they are registered with the coresight bus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c  | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h  |  1 +
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c       | 17 ++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> > index f21eb28b6782..292bd409a68c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> >  #include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/stringhash.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >
> > @@ -43,8 +44,18 @@ static const struct attribute_group etm_pmu_format_group = {
> >       .attrs  = etm_config_formats_attr,
> >  };
> >
> > +static struct attribute *etm_config_sinks_attr[] = {
> > +     NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group etm_pmu_sinks_group = {
> > +     .name   = "sinks",
> > +     .attrs  = etm_config_sinks_attr,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct attribute_group *etm_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
> >       &etm_pmu_format_group,
> > +     &etm_pmu_sinks_group,
> >       NULL,
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -479,6 +490,38 @@ int etm_perf_symlink(struct coresight_device *csdev, bool link)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static ssize_t etm_perf_sink_name_show(struct device *dev,
> > +                                    struct device_attribute *dattr,
> > +                                    char *buf)
> > +{
> > +     /* See function coresight_sink_by_id() to know where this is used */
> > +     u32 hash = hashlen_hash(hashlen_string(NULL, dattr->attr.name));
> > +
> > +     return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%x\n", hash);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int etm_perf_symlink_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *pmu_dev = etm_pmu.dev;
> > +     struct device *pdev = csdev->dev.parent;
> > +     struct device_attribute *dev_attr;
> > +
> > +     if (csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK &&
> > +         csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (!etm_perf_up)
> > +             return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > +
> > +     dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     dev_attr->attr.name = kstrdup(dev_name(pdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     dev_attr->attr.mode = 0444;
> > +     dev_attr->show = etm_perf_sink_name_show;
> > +
> > +     return sysfs_add_file_to_group(&pmu_dev->kobj,
> > +                                    &dev_attr->attr, "sinks");
>
> What is so odd about this call that you needed me to review this?

As far as I can tell nobody is feeding a dynamic struct attribute to
the function and I wasn't sure if it was because they were told not to
or simply because it wasn't needed, hence asking for a second opinion.

>
> And what happens if this call fails, do you leak memory?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel