From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE95C2BB85 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7B8120656 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Wur10tzX"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ensIBQhT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E7B8120656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=f+WUzOR2wezLe3VtON8JLsQnR2zbqS3qU8purQU/xpU=; b=Wur10tzXvVIFIO EiT0vOnzLYxd3WceoinP+yrpASLxl6zR6FAphtaFzlsLc0K10+vIr2WpiTr55Xa3s8CRoO0xk+d2W rRn0yVQRB6r+oAcAAbRlOSkD5skPILMQMKwOstZc5oDQudZnwfEzbr8VPIoQvxkvVcpLwCMul8Rnf D1S7tKkkDX2SEJc09diKff4dyiG0UUXNx4dnOoRUNUMzv2PLGfLTt11AOzjjhSJvAiof2BpmGsvBw lF2UjuuAsdUK21v98sNBBLKjOBAHn75MGdGI5wbhbqDw4B0kQGKtZcKv3XPKuFlffGu5rO8Tjz9/O a0ANh1jA71xp6b5LY+Bg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOkgl-0000JK-Oe; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:14:59 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOkgj-0000IY-GA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:14:58 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id i27so441685ota.7 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YY754z9PeJMmvslMfaTQ60iPR2h8d8EcgLpNFKs6TXQ=; b=ensIBQhTLfMUhI/AckVjVSeNIMurfIMWlyjQNC/y5Q1n7X+sGHs4D9Oj738io+6WKn q2Qz6jdWHlsLR8zgo9vbuOru8r2nwbOuQpjauUXlDEyrjyx+/Oru+42U19TfNVW1bm4Q V4m66v0rPlaBKNn4G/i9kCLpyUoayUjPU8Pn0Y9xY3vS6jSERLN8RInC04HBbf5rK3kp 0mBGR8KABY3swFRi3z9R2jpb0OPQAF6Z5UmZlfGAU0byMnbraf/GjP1Ovebc9H0MGrCG BY54TPpG+RrUpYd/cqywxRmA5oCwGKtcaBoGxFvBw5G9hnLrVxJCRNuCj6vAAlkRJHtv 3kbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YY754z9PeJMmvslMfaTQ60iPR2h8d8EcgLpNFKs6TXQ=; b=M0bnUgf8/pHMhHAanuS8x178wktUgrP+Cv3DXo5jgPWUWarwjW38WRm/FUz1Wbu+KK 0A3uhszN9igJtdPBsuK/kgdaYN6sXYq8+XT76yYfSobm0SbsFIm9bqW6zMcCkw6dkvU5 Lg0nOuQIEFg65UKH+UnGcwnHxB9AGA7tF094gcmmvGeeQfwmqMG3EDX2DVuVk2AIhoWm M5B64ppUAQH3H2Ee+ZgMNW9g9O+7E1v0VTev2xGDIZjeYSJikqkj9ItfcMXY/LrEY1w3 z6OIQ/wz94EThClwr9rAy5TiQ+9Ns5ciL7d5rwnEE7eDFNhsgglxyXixARdRrorRFE04 h9rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZnX9ZJVK8j/ecvqVoLSID+Jo9SgAnN7XmJceyS5vqCc47Yk4jp lvK4768bb/OHnAayBni7Y/ZyLiI6WdB3Xb4Kb1U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKmOr4pyj5woZliOKqqj9jDH9F/Bq9sHVlUWf6TaSVf+a6bzHks4NlheUCnPxbK/0asJqZNCnLSyAr1bvDFDto= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:629a:: with SMTP id x26mr21214050otk.201.1586967295087; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200225073731.465270-1-avagin@gmail.com> <1c1ab662-5475-9d8b-038b-8411b060202a@arm.com> <1d9c4c56-af16-e54f-08ca-76c6570b2d53@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1d9c4c56-af16-e54f-08ca-76c6570b2d53@arm.com> From: Andrei Vagin Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:14:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support To: Vincenzo Frascino X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200415_091457_559977_93A79D81 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.07 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Safonov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > > On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino > > wrote: > >> > >> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the > >> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on > >> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected? > > > > static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct > > timespec64 *tp) > > { > > struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)]; > > > > if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a > > separate patch to handle this case in tests properly. > > > > This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again. I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72 > > Are you planning as well to rebase this set? What is the right tree to rebase on? Thanks, Andrei _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel