From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7607DC433FF for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498C22133F for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="C9RqeI4J"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XlyDTQw/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 498C22133F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0JbCqSUIOgXWPUJj4SfUvyN53QDnt9T9oXtr4M/TOS8=; b=C9RqeI4Jn8tqLA IknhDbQPk+hoRUQUnm1P///BUUTEpHf2ucxa7WJPiU912tqan0RYSNZVqrQ13Clyezxrez+qU8pZR V6ive9XcY+sdsDbFfwkqQh7vIDOR2o1p5LaIuOhCEl2jdlWcB2XR/9zPTTL14bowedZ1O0QFL6a+O XbLe7i3qcriauMWmygFtJshP0Eqr+CKrJNRQ1NLih13xkxhcaZWVvV8zOkGDjMTWMk++h7SvCHbAy Xi2Ld5w2gv2QYbyO4pBAfOOlo5d3VUJCO+EoNd972Z3V1de3xYRB/S79EzdYWyS00bDHx3GcqLiFU ZDgS/5SVkmHhsdZ8ZOVQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hyBkd-0007DL-I5; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:08:55 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hyBkY-0007D1-1M for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:08:51 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id e27so1626998ljb.7 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:08:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0UE6srbxTSzeQEGUqQmtIA5ElC0/7wYx3fPkt29gctA=; b=XlyDTQw/LApnV+/jl3INSQ0k5kkAC/D/oC26vZ9uWE9MEg3xW3781+knczAv4Aaf2a dDTP8F6TCi/OyI8bPVdVCN57ntl7atgf2pmtMC4foq3XyLYv54jwaSDTyigDmaFJTuLN HTYTpKOlcK2VdKCMk8hfpSwDNOy1+V/tesvKx3CEkop4q6eSIwmZjdmvxmfgW0VLzJpo VpiFsTYq9biPd7m6Uq3jDpyl2233BEL5+bvbFpJGe+zqxEAugwnqxL34d4WJhoZJQ/2G QKS1ERct7SoOBMBQ65iClNzCB5N9LYZ54uUvZj8xrYylAk3KOoTygKBs5tRFQQ6eXQyL LmQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0UE6srbxTSzeQEGUqQmtIA5ElC0/7wYx3fPkt29gctA=; b=qMA2UnkOToJKJRAWV2A5wE3mKPZT31IUqiPsh3FBKxLz5RPs2Xa/z9HcX6YcIRPZ7a +XJv5v0oNwsOoUiS+6jBPIp7Nh2GazpR/kj0K80bWw/cX6ewbcX2gxS7VLWRGKw21fmS 66TJuH+SEOvIVUm7uaGeOjRLqZOUx3ZALK7vOEWSOFfEw+cT+g4XtMXwwiqL/KBsXF4W OUBX0plAI8E35NXA8dLeSD+3q4VKaeLSfp5yGpyXh/T7rR0gF3rJHOx5nMc9Eh5CdkHP /A+t5DD1tRBQjJAW2i7uyUtj1V6n6fteo2g+cA42/p0chiFRpP0A1O/iAm/O61vnd64N fjgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXHDA1jiyGxbss5/YTfjvfiXiQYXswcdANfOai81yWMwdv6QLcV cGSJQlYWLDBECtJhpKgg0+sBohEJSjJE6lnjgwk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMEUAJffcAHkjsEhd8NMusg/7M2UPC/oaiZA76NFZ6YUgtOx0nJ3OvlVQjfSslMzS/Nsbw4g+olqzqauqWEC8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9252:: with SMTP id v18mr1033100ljg.93.1565860127855; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:08:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812215052.71840-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190812215052.71840-12-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190813082744.xmzmm4j675rqiz47@willie-the-truck> <20190813170829.c3lryb6va3eopxd7@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h To: Nick Desaulniers X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190815_020850_106879_B8FEE8BF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.14 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , Daniel Borkmann , clang-built-linux , Allison Randal , Yonghong Song , Masayoshi Mizuma , Suzuki K Poulose , Andrey Konovalov , Shaokun Zhang , Alexios Zavras , Josh Poimboeuf , Sedat Dilek , Thomas Gleixner , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel , Network Development , Andrew Morton , Enrico Weigelt , Martin KaFai Lau Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:20 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > This lone patch of the series is just cosmetic, but patch 14/16 fixes > a real boot issue: > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/619 > Miguel, I'd like to get that one landed ASAP; the rest are just for consistency. Ah, interesting. It would be best to have sent that one independently to the others, plus adding a commit message mentioning this in particular. Let's talk about that in the thread. > Miguel, how do you want to take the rest of these patches? Will picked > up the arm64 one, I think the SuperH one got picked up. There was > feedback to add more info to individual commits' commit messages. Yes, I told Will I would pick up whatever is not already picked up by individual maintainers. > I kept these tree wide changes separate to improve the likelihood that > they'd backport to stable cleanly, but could always squash if you'd > prefer to have 1 patch instead of a series. Just let me know. Since you already did the splitting work, let's take advantage of it. I prefer them to be split anyway, since that gives maintainers a chance to pick them up individually if they prefer to do so. Cheers, Miguel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel