From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14619C48BD6 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C34208CA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="e3nqSQ55"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="oaAlCKm5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C7C34208CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=97kPwGukLCStAfVIn3w3o7j/zhKxoPI0pTbITQAzqFA=; b=e3nqSQ55c+Rys1 7QUIrwUPNXbxdZ5qrPeDYtHpL0r9VxI7GvmyRpCNpEqIZKxENt5p1IQNY2nRQePshpGO0OUndTcRF S3euaijcNK7Okchluyu6VdClyz9aqJ2ylTY0XgYR2HXxNHn0ef5tzK/U5WXDgaTscYw1cnZmsqzff 46MOzNXPd+xc70ev+j/ObUJbf25ba0ycL6BrsbG4zZbPQhHo84yNJ+PQKwi/AHFgoYxXUyLSsHIbF 7dU2Vk6EPFf4tyZG//VBiKc/j215opUKpQ3T8s7wuHcDKbLl/CECs4iiJcefRblEiD7SKNWkeq+2Q wBSQCTNX0JF3Ey8fCkhA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hfkgq-0005OX-N8; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:36:48 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hfkgm-0005O9-T5 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:36:46 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id w25so1950023ioc.8 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:36:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xvOVsIqivKL0v3SHYT6dF2qM1JyQCXVqRbWQvdYMp3Q=; b=oaAlCKm5215lYggf2TQotMlHKsxT6Xb/hI7Ha5yKbfiRcXjPBzsRlvM2OdOQzxidON EmnQZjLonu4ZRgiai/u72cEGJVj0xcSUtoLbOvaJdyE+/pP4mUyWjQfGdKJVeOZ1WKqw 9t9smlfN5QPMLbDj4NC1RpDHZuXkQtOrO9nOzHL5SzXFYnV0Qil8HJ0AgTqs38tJ+8iR wFwH4RZ9yk80zke1hp0BBPOyVJ693zj9awJOmqaZk1NKFqZpcs7dMFPdpzg6mxB9IjY+ sU0i4D4GEfwVSFKZ4ABTNRwh8GS/C4oBtdgQJXphW1ivT6lNKzzTUPms7IAFRv9NR06m jI/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xvOVsIqivKL0v3SHYT6dF2qM1JyQCXVqRbWQvdYMp3Q=; b=tl0ejTippRlaIZOJYLgqlc7R199nGWEUkZ3i0Zx75WmMnxUzVpRQZufKqAABIlpSDK wFUE4J66BItr2qHcW0DO0jtFO/23M96zNQF8iXOMVQGe393+fuzNy84YI0St5rvDFEs6 lvv8KJV1pLB275cA65Zs1XGdfuOs8KcZ2BGWkoeirCpG5RCSothErUDTH85XyNTlUpwq 96QXBVpQbpT81wrEWa2W4lVWgclPRo4T2C8YcvVFUHbksvIwF9mHAZsXBqS603aHA04C M9dTAZr3t0LPe3ujs5ZtxIVdiiSKI0QadVO1uoSyLXTVoL24qmtOORqMm97fBM1Z/nts 0Ohg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfeVp6GcBXdxbW1fAEx3IU7q4zqaO5r8wgzEYr4bLQBIDLiSoi 4a/BQ+3CR+/coa8eJCRB4raYa9BBs16sl42Vb7cclWKBM0Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIXPC/KZvjbMHV63ZlkLPFoew8MCROuDcVu/L47fh5CUkjGm+msT1sJvsKH5g05otQoPgHlTMIGb0Zzn2UZ3U= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9257:: with SMTP id u84mr42653766iod.278.1561466203531; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 05:36:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <459c0bad-c02e-40f0-9e56-1dcdad9c6591.lettre@localhost> <20190625114119.tgxsiwstd3pfm64i@localhost> <20190625123219.hwg5vjz3qocxavn5@flea> In-Reply-To: <20190625123219.hwg5vjz3qocxavn5@flea> From: Olof Johansson Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:36:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Allwinner Device Tree Changes for 5.3 To: Maxime Ripard X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190625_053644_945914_12A47AA5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , ARM-SoC Maintainers , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:32 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:41:19AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:08:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Please pull the following changes for the next release. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Maxime > > > > > > The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9: > > > > > > Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git refs/tags/sunxi-dt-for-5.3-201906210807 > > > > You know, there's a timestamp in the tag too, no need to encode it in the name. > > Yeah, I've switched to some tooling to send them instead of doing them > manually, and having a timestamp was the easiest solution to avoid a > collision, but I guess having it down to the minute was a bit > overkill. Do you have any preference on this? Main thing for me is that I can't tell from time timestamps if it's a respin/new version, or a re-stamp, i.e. if it's something I should care about or not. I.e. it doesn't carry any useful signal for the consuming side and is mostly noise. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel