[PATCH V2 0/2] mmc: mmci_sdmmc: fixes and improvements

[PATCH V2 0/2] mmc: mmci_sdmmc: fixes and improvements

[Ludovic Barre]

This patch series fixes some problems:
-Clear busyd0end irq flag when a R1B busy is completed.
-Initialize pwr|clk|datactrl_reg with their hardware values at probe.

Ludovic Barre (2):
  mmc: mmci_sdmmc: fix clear busyd0end irq flag
  mmc: mmci: initialize pwr|clk|datactrl_reg with their hardware values

 drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c             | 4 ++++
 drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: mmci_sdmmc: fix clear busyd0end irq flag

[Ludovic Barre]

The busyd0 line transition can be very fast. The busy request
may be completed by busy_d0end without wait the busy_d0 steps.
The busyd0end irq flag must be cleared even if no busy_status.

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
index f76e82f8f12f..d33e62bd6153 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
@@ -358,11 +358,11 @@ static bool sdmmc_busy_complete(struct mmci_host *host, u32 status, u32 err_msk)
 	if (host->busy_status) {
 		writel_relaxed(mask & ~host->variant->busy_detect_mask,
 			       base + MMCIMASK0);
-		writel_relaxed(host->variant->busy_detect_mask,
-			       base + MMCICLEAR);
 		host->busy_status = 0;
 	}
 
+	writel_relaxed(host->variant->busy_detect_mask, base + MMCICLEAR);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mmc: mmci_sdmmc: fix clear busyd0end irq flag

[Ulf Hansson]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 15:34, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> wrote:
>
> The busyd0 line transition can be very fast. The busy request
> may be completed by busy_d0end without wait the busy_d0 steps.
> The busyd0end irq flag must be cleared even if no busy_status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

Applied for next, by adding a fixes+stable tag, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> index f76e82f8f12f..d33e62bd6153 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci_stm32_sdmmc.c
> @@ -358,11 +358,11 @@ static bool sdmmc_busy_complete(struct mmci_host *host, u32 status, u32 err_msk)
>         if (host->busy_status) {
>                 writel_relaxed(mask & ~host->variant->busy_detect_mask,
>                                base + MMCIMASK0);
> -               writel_relaxed(host->variant->busy_detect_mask,
> -                              base + MMCICLEAR);
>                 host->busy_status = 0;
>         }
>
> +       writel_relaxed(host->variant->busy_detect_mask, base + MMCICLEAR);
> +
>         return true;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: initialize pwr|clk|datactrl_reg with their hardware values

[Ludovic Barre]

In mmci_write_pwr|clk|datactrlreg functions, if the desired value
is equal to corresponding variable (pwr_reg|clk_reg|datactrl_reg),
the value is not written in the register.

At probe pwr|clk|datactrl_reg of mmci_host structure are initialized
to 0 (kzalloc of mmc_alloc_host). But they does not necessarily reflect
hardware value of these registers, if they are used while boot level.
This is problematic, if we want to write 0 in these registers.

This patch initializes pwr|clk|datactrl_reg variables with their
hardware values while probing.

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
index 647567def612..f378ae18d5dc 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
@@ -2085,6 +2085,10 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
 	else if (plat->ocr_mask)
 		dev_warn(mmc_dev(mmc), "Platform OCR mask is ignored\n");
 
+	host->pwr_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIPOWER);
+	host->clk_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCICLOCK);
+	host->datactrl_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIDATACTRL);
+
 	/* We support these capabilities. */
 	mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CMD23;
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: initialize pwr|clk|datactrl_reg with their hardware values

[Ulf Hansson]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 15:34, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> wrote:
>
> In mmci_write_pwr|clk|datactrlreg functions, if the desired value
> is equal to corresponding variable (pwr_reg|clk_reg|datactrl_reg),
> the value is not written in the register.
>
> At probe pwr|clk|datactrl_reg of mmci_host structure are initialized
> to 0 (kzalloc of mmc_alloc_host). But they does not necessarily reflect
> hardware value of these registers, if they are used while boot level.
> This is problematic, if we want to write 0 in these registers.

It could be, but I don't see that we ever needs to do that - at least
not before we have written some other non-zero values to them (through
the helper functions).

>
> This patch initializes pwr|clk|datactrl_reg variables with their
> hardware values while probing.

Hmm, so in principle this change seems quite okay, but I am hesitant
to pick it up - unless it really addresses a problem that you have
observed.

The reason is, this change may lead to avoiding to re-write the
register with the same value it got during boot - and who knows what
is best here.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> index 647567def612..f378ae18d5dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> @@ -2085,6 +2085,10 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
>         else if (plat->ocr_mask)
>                 dev_warn(mmc_dev(mmc), "Platform OCR mask is ignored\n");
>
> +       host->pwr_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIPOWER);
> +       host->clk_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCICLOCK);
> +       host->datactrl_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIDATACTRL);
> +
>         /* We support these capabilities. */
>         mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CMD23;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: mmci: initialize pwr|clk|datactrl_reg with their hardware values

[Ludovic BARRE]

hi Ulf

Le 3/26/20 à 3:27 PM, Ulf Hansson a écrit :
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 15:34, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> In mmci_write_pwr|clk|datactrlreg functions, if the desired value
>> is equal to corresponding variable (pwr_reg|clk_reg|datactrl_reg),
>> the value is not written in the register.
>>
>> At probe pwr|clk|datactrl_reg of mmci_host structure are initialized
>> to 0 (kzalloc of mmc_alloc_host). But they does not necessarily reflect
>> hardware value of these registers, if they are used while boot level.
>> This is problematic, if we want to write 0 in these registers.
> 
> It could be, but I don't see that we ever needs to do that - at least
> not before we have written some other non-zero values to them (through
> the helper functions).
> 

The sdmmc variant is slightly different on pwr_ctrl field
of MMCIPOWER register.

In classic mmci we have 3 or 2 values:
MMCI_PWR_OFF(0x0), MMCI_PWR_UP(0x2)optional, MMCI_PWR_ON(0x3)
-When you switch the external power supply off, the software set
  power-off (0x0).

-When you switch the external power supply on, the software first enters
  the power-up(0x2) phase, and waits until the supply output is stable
  before moving to the power-on (0x3)phase.

On sdmmc we have 3 values:
MMCI_PWR_OFF(0x0), MCI_STM32_PWR_CYC(0x2), MMCI_PWR_ON(0x3)
-When you switch the external power supply off, the software must
  MCI_STM32_PWR_CYC(0x2) => This will make that the SDMMC_D[7:0],
  SDMMC_CMD and SDMMC_CK are driven low, to prevent the card from being
  supplied through the signal lines.

-When you switch the external power supply on, when supply output is
  stable the MMCI_PWR_OFF(0x0) state can be apply (minimum 1ms) => The
  SDMMC_D[7:0], SDMMC_CMD and SDMMC_CK are set to drive “1”. After
  MMCI_PWR_ON(0x3) stat could be set.

In fact the last value of power off sequence is different between
classic and sdmmc:
The classic mmci finish the power off sequence by 0x0, But the sdmmc
finish by 0x2, and we must write 0x0 in power on sequence before set
MMCI_PWR_ON.
The 0x0 value is not written due to kzalloc value of pwr_reg
(which not reflect hardware value of pwr register).

>>
>> This patch initializes pwr|clk|datactrl_reg variables with their
>> hardware values while probing.
> 
> Hmm, so in principle this change seems quite okay, but I am hesitant
> to pick it up - unless it really addresses a problem that you have
> observed.
> 
> The reason is, this change may lead to avoiding to re-write the
> register with the same value it got during boot - and who knows what
> is best here.

I understand your hesitation.
If you prefer, I can move the pwr_reg initialisation
in sdmmc_variant_init ?

Regards
Ludo

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> index 647567def612..f378ae18d5dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
>> @@ -2085,6 +2085,10 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
>>          else if (plat->ocr_mask)
>>                  dev_warn(mmc_dev(mmc), "Platform OCR mask is ignored\n");
>>
>> +       host->pwr_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIPOWER);
>> +       host->clk_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCICLOCK);
>> +       host->datactrl_reg = readl_relaxed(host->base + MMCIDATACTRL);
>> +
>>          /* We support these capabilities. */
>>          mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CMD23;
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel