From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:36:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v11 06/19] irqchip: gic: Provide support for
 interrupt	grouping
In-Reply-To: <20140902193355.GW30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1408466769-20004-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
 <1409662853-29313-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
 <1409662853-29313-7-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
 <20140902193355.GW30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <CBF5C246-DBB2-4FC3-A507-CA3E15013F7C@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 2 Sep 2014, at 20:33, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> index 4b959e6..423707c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
>> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
>> 
>> #include <asm/cputype.h>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FIQ
>> +#include <asm/fiq.h>
>> +#endif
> 
> Is there much advantage to this ifdef over providing a dummy asm/fiq.h
> in ARM64?

While it?s unlikely we?ll use FIQs on arm64 (they are generally
reserved for the secure world/firmware), I don?t mind an empty
asm/fiq.h file.

Catalin