From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: JOLLYS@xilinx.com (Jolly Shah)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:29:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: clk: Add clk_get_children support
In-Reply-To: <152148371542.242365.18433130635050412528@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <1519856861-31384-1-git-send-email-jollys@xilinx.com>
 <1519856861-31384-2-git-send-email-jollys@xilinx.com>
 <152148371542.242365.18433130635050412528@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Message-ID: <DM2PR0201MB07679A2DF21F254ACD5E0417B8AB0@DM2PR0201MB0767.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Stephan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd at kernel.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 11:22 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
> mark.rutland at arm.com; michal.simek at xilinx.com; mturquette at baylibre.com;
> robh+dt at kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org
> Cc: Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xilinx.com>; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Jolly Shah
> <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>; Tejas Patel
> <TEJASP@xilinx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@xilinx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: clk: Add clk_get_children support
> 
> Quoting Jolly Shah (2018-02-28 14:27:39)
> > From: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@xilinx.com>
> >
> > This API helps to determine the users for any clock.
> 
> Ok, but why do you need it?

As you suggested in other patch, we will move children validation in FW.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jollys@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejas Patel <tejasp@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/clk.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/clk-provider.h |  1 +
> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index
> > 0f686a9..947a18b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -274,6 +274,34 @@ struct clk_hw *clk_hw_get_parent(const struct
> > clk_hw *hw)  }  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_get_parent);
> >
> > +static unsigned int sibling;
> 
> Looks very thread unsafe!
> 
> > +
> > +static void clk_show_subtree(struct clk_core *c,
> > +                            int level) {
> > +       struct clk_core *child;
> > +
> > +       if (!c)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       if (level == 1)
> > +               sibling++;
> > +
> > +       hlist_for_each_entry(child, &c->children, child_node)
> > +               clk_show_subtree(child, level + 1); }
> > +
> > +unsigned int clk_get_children(char *name) {
> > +       struct clk_core *core;
> > +       struct clk *pclk = __clk_lookup(name);
> > +
> > +       sibling = 0;
> > +       core = pclk->core;
> > +       clk_show_subtree(core, 0);
> > +       return sibling;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct clk_core *__clk_lookup_subtree(const char *name,
> >                                              struct clk_core *core)  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > b/include/linux/clk-provider.h index f711be6..e94dfb2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> > @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk
> > *clk);  unsigned long clk_hw_get_rate(const struct clk_hw *hw);
> > unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk);  unsigned long
> > clk_hw_get_flags(const struct clk_hw *hw);
> > +unsigned int clk_get_children(char *name);
> 
> And uses a string lookup instead of having the clk_hw pointer in hand.
> No thanks.