From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48AFC31E49 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56C320B1F for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="h7bz0MrU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.b="jVZh7i5N" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B56C320B1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xilinx.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aa1rOdWDzlvouEIpdLSJTjEsf11UZHvXWi6Lvf5HQnQ=; b=h7bz0MrUiLNldk ah00FguuE0WqH0YmLCKMfBofUE3LBZylUpyHEC1iZo+6XA/YjvUdozK5JJhEQDa1a2Sp9MTvIdqzh 6+U0V5odMIgSCHwBX//8Ma4Lr5mNKmBn4VCeHqYGSbFNH7y2B+d2HWRJt2XmSvI1pgVujoDB8guGi Q/HHfdyN21t9chcknU23cGgFXsCKLfePSCRyNlRUdXLKMCECc6/a6oN0j6MVs5fTRCBwajHrMpsM/ QHvdICL8B3hAiiNASQhsePKGH1qvbRJn+9gmtGn32eYr7o2O9DeXfzZOQFLc2haXK7XPNM98Qtx+e aFxww0BvUqPAbGbW6KGw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdW98-0001Y0-S4; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:40:46 +0000 Received: from mail-sn1nam04on060c.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f400:fe4c::60c] helo=NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdW94-0001Wy-Ci for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:40:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=l7U/WCR6BCULOmh2jJCdOpnjjteIdVUj4zPU1ANIguI=; b=jVZh7i5NjX+XHpub3gy5uDEqk8U0RbIcXJJWgYBtoKJJ9NNkQdA8ncMS39IrgeM5o3jT/NYGPvqADDfkbLc6fnzxQz0sPjvNXCZfuPBxN42YSFI/s4r+9GLr+TNcOEKQzpjyExpILvDQ9Uu4bA7d2a0uXUFvKtW2D58DVeCB4rU= Received: from MN2PR02MB6029.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.255.7.10) by MN2PR02MB6272.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (52.132.174.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.11; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:40:37 +0000 Received: from MN2PR02MB6029.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e55a:e2d1:953f:ed3b]) by MN2PR02MB6029.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e55a:e2d1:953f:ed3b%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1987.014; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:40:37 +0000 From: Manish Narani To: Ulf Hansson , Michal Simek Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add support for ZynqMP Platform Tap Delays Setup Thread-Topic: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add support for ZynqMP Platform Tap Delays Setup Thread-Index: AQHVIDwWKZKZdF95gUaFGq/oqBvspKafu1mAgAADioCAAA8FAIAC5Ktw Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:40:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1560247011-26369-1-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <1560247011-26369-4-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <5feac3fb-bef3-b7d1-57d6-81e115e1f555@xilinx.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=MNARANI@xilinx.com; x-originating-ip: [149.199.50.133] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 17b2548e-1602-416c-380e-08d6f491cd5c x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR02MB6272; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR02MB6272: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0073BFEF03 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(51444003)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(4326008)(256004)(66066001)(71190400001)(71200400001)(5660300002)(8936002)(52536014)(11346002)(7696005)(99286004)(102836004)(476003)(8676002)(4744005)(74316002)(486006)(14454004)(76176011)(81166006)(81156014)(6506007)(446003)(25786009)(478600001)(54906003)(110136005)(86362001)(6636002)(305945005)(55016002)(9686003)(229853002)(7736002)(2906002)(6436002)(53936002)(68736007)(72206003)(186003)(33656002)(3846002)(6116002)(76116006)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(6246003)(73956011)(316002)(66946007)(26005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR02MB6272; H:MN2PR02MB6029.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: xilinx.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: WJX/FACNmavOXlyP/KqvQ6DeHtyxcdUETgvD0uaVOMRDD4kCJuO5TzEXv7UADRxVLkUlviMdjn3ejmkDuzxZr+EjHCpe0KLu0ksDFiNLaXKZ4R+lGv5pEiBUHiiflx6VEjBxZuW/9AyVcT+FC2/odtZWRFmFKpmNkdbeHfbSv4M+gg3/muVb0G4yFHwQQxwpM2AOLldQK+HG6vr64K76svaikBy6SMo4/GYk5z8AsPiuOEmQdEJnZCQm108TIXZF4Hy4a7zHTq2BKi5C7VHlmAh0aUPNQXgpkD3h2PvXMXTDyBYZFpCnxAvL98KS42sPx2oRoKZLvkeHNj+IZMjsMxXKXnEGl7a7JBwg2re1xpArLIGiY1lol3cXD9ta6O8S1nNceFBsNxvH8EiVPxTpGjM8YCNuOSRLCodIL2aYPOE= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 17b2548e-1602-416c-380e-08d6f491cd5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Jun 2019 08:40:37.0593 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: mnarani@xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR02MB6272 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190619_014042_435586_360539D0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , DTML , Nava kishore Manne , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Adrian Hunter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jolly Shah , Rajan Vaja , Rob Herring , Olof Johansson , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Uffe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ulf Hansson > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 5:51 PM [...] > > The "const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops; should then be moved into > a clock provider specific struct, which is assigned when calling > sdhci_arasan_register_sdclk. I understand that all the clock data is > folded into struct sdhci_arasan_data today, but I think that should be > moved into a "sub-struct" for the clock specifics. > > Moreover, when registering the clock, we should convert from using > devm_clk_register() into devm_clk_hw_register() as the first one is > now deprecated. Just a query here: When we switch to using devm_clk_hw_register() here, it will register the clk_hw and return int. Is there a way we can get the clk (related to the clk_hw registered) from the clock framework? I am asking this because we will need that clk pointer while calling clk_set_phase() function. Thanks, Manish _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel