From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: "Artur Świgoń" <a.swigon@partner.samsung.com>,
"Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Lukasz Luba" <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"MyungJoo Ham" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
"Alexandre Bailon" <abailon@baylibre.com>,
"Georgi Djakov" <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Jacky Bai" <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] PM / devfreq: Add PM QoS support
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:43:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB702397D04A0F2FFE8111E341EE860@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5f12931b-92f8-15d8-8498-f02a7c2e999f@samsung.com
On 2019-09-26 4:07 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 19. 9. 26. 오전 6:18, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>> On 25.09.2019 05:11, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 19. 9. 24. 오후 7:11, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>>>> Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework in order to respond to
>>>> requests for DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY and DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY.
>>>>
>>>> No notifiers are added by this patch but PM QoS constraints can be
>>>> imposed externally (for example from other devices).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/linux/devfreq.h | 5 +++
>>>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> index eee403e70c84..784f3e40536a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
>>>> @@ -22,15 +22,18 @@
>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> #include <linux/list.h>
>>>> #include <linux/printk.h>
>>>> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>>>> #include "governor.h"
>>>>
>>>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>>> #include <trace/events/devfreq.h>
>>>>
>>>> +#define HZ_PER_KHZ 1000
>>>> +
>>>> static struct class *devfreq_class;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * devfreq core provides delayed work based load monitoring helper
>>>> * functions. Governors can use these or can implement their own
>>>> @@ -109,10 +112,11 @@ static unsigned long find_available_max_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>>> static void get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
>>>> unsigned long *min_freq,
>>>> unsigned long *max_freq)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table;
>>>> + unsigned long qos_min_freq, qos_max_freq;
>>>>
>>>> lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Init min/max frequency from freq table.
>>>> @@ -125,10 +129,18 @@ static void get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
>>>> } else {
>>>> *min_freq = freq_table[devfreq->profile->max_state - 1];
>>>> *max_freq = freq_table[0];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* constraints from PM QoS */
>>>
>>> As I commented on patch4,
>>> 'constraints' -> 'Constraint' because first verb have to be used
>>> as the sigular verbs.
>>
>> Already discussed for another patch; I will modify to "Apply constraints
>> from PM QoS" instead.
>
> I agree the new comment with 'Apply constraints ... '.
>
>>
>>> I prefer to use following comments:
>>>
>>> /* Constraint minimum/maximum frequency from PM QoS constraints */
>>>
>>>> + qos_min_freq = dev_pm_qos_read_value(devfreq->dev.parent,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY);
>>>> + qos_max_freq = dev_pm_qos_read_value(devfreq->dev.parent,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY);
>>>> + *min_freq = max(*min_freq, HZ_PER_KHZ * qos_min_freq);
>>>> + *max_freq = min(*max_freq, HZ_PER_KHZ * qos_max_freq);
>>>> +
>>>> /* constraints from sysfs */
>>>> *min_freq = max(*min_freq, devfreq->min_freq);
>>>> *max_freq = min(*max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);
>>>>
>>>> /* constraints from OPP interface */
>>>> @@ -606,10 +618,49 @@ static int devfreq_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long type,
>>>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>>>>
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * qos_notifier_call() - Common handler for QoS constraints.
>>>> + * @devfreq: the devfreq instance.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int qos_notifier_call(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int err;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>>>> + err = update_devfreq(devfreq);
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + dev_err(devfreq->dev.parent,
>>>> + "failed to update frequency for PM QoS constraints (%d)\n",
>>>
>>> Is it not over 80 char?
>>
>> Yes but coding style explicitly forbids breaking strings.
>>
>>>> + err);
>>>> +
>>>> + return NOTIFY_OK;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * qos_min_notifier_call() - Callback for QoS min_freq changes.
>>>> + * @nb: Should be devfreq->nb_min
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int qos_min_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>> + unsigned long val, void *ptr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return qos_notifier_call(container_of(nb, struct devfreq, nb_min));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * qos_max_notifier_call() - Callback for QoS max_freq changes.
>>>> + * @nb: Should be devfreq->nb_max
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int qos_max_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>> + unsigned long val, void *ptr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return qos_notifier_call(container_of(nb, struct devfreq, nb_max));
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>> * devfreq_dev_release() - Callback for struct device to release the device.
>>>> * @dev: the devfreq device
>>>> *
>>>> * Remove devfreq from the list and release its resources.
>>>> @@ -620,10 +671,15 @@ static void devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>>>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>> list_del(&devfreq->node);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>>
>>>> + dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(devfreq->dev.parent, &devfreq->nb_max,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY);
>>>> + dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(devfreq->dev.parent, &devfreq->nb_min,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Just print error with dev_err() without stopping the release step.
>>>
>>> I prefer to handle the return value if kernel API provides
>>> the error code.
>
> How about?
Modified to dev_warn. This also applies to PATCH 6 so I replied there.
>>>> if (devfreq->profile->exit)
>>>> devfreq->profile->exit(devfreq->dev.parent);
>>>>
>>>> kfree(devfreq->time_in_state);
>>>> kfree(devfreq->trans_table);
>>>> @@ -733,10 +789,28 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>>> if (err) {
>>>> put_device(&devfreq->dev);
>>>> goto err_out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Register notifiers for updates to min/max_freq after device is
>>>> + * initialized (and we can handle notifications) but before the
>>>> + * governor is started (which should do an initial enforcement of
>>>> + * constraints).
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> My previous comment is not enough why I prefer to remove it. Sorry.
>>> Actually, until now, the devfreq_add_device() don't have the detailed
>>> comments because the line code is not too long. But, at the present time,
>>> devfreq_add_device() is too long. It means that the detailed comment
>>> are necessary.
>>>
>>> So, I'll add the detailed comment for each step of devfreq_add_device()
>>> on separate patch to keep the same style. I'll send the patch to you
>>> for the review.
>>
>> This is very likely to result in merge conflicts, maybe wait for my
>> series to go in first?
>
> I'll send the separate patch after finished the review of these patches.
> So, if you agree, please remove this comment on this patch.
>
> You can review the detailed comments on separate patch when I send.
This patch already contains comments and they explain the code being
added. Doesn't it make more sense for comments and code to go in together?
I think the comment is a resonable explanation as to why notifiers are
registered at that specific step in the initialization sequence.
>>>> + devfreq->nb_min.notifier_call = qos_min_notifier_call;
>>>> + err = dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(devfreq->dev.parent, &devfreq->nb_min,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + goto err_devfreq;
>>>> +
>>>> + devfreq->nb_max.notifier_call = qos_max_notifier_call;
>>>> + err = dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(devfreq->dev.parent, &devfreq->nb_max,
>>>> + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + goto err_devfreq;
>>>> +
>>>> mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>>
>>>> governor = try_then_request_governor(devfreq->governor_name);
>>>> if (IS_ERR(governor)) {
>>>> dev_err(dev, "%s: Unable to find governor for the device\n",
>>>> @@ -760,10 +834,11 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>>>
>>>> return devfreq;
>>>>
>>>> err_init:
>>>> mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
>>>> +err_devfreq:
>>>> devfreq_remove_device(devfreq);
>>>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>>>>
>>>> err_dev:
>>>> /*
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/devfreq.h b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>>> index c3cbc15fdf08..dac0dffeabb4 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/devfreq.h
>>>> @@ -134,10 +134,12 @@ struct devfreq_dev_profile {
>>>> * @total_trans: Number of devfreq transitions
>>>> * @trans_table: Statistics of devfreq transitions
>>>> * @time_in_state: Statistics of devfreq states
>>>> * @last_stat_updated: The last time stat updated
>>>> * @transition_notifier_list: list head of DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier
>>>> + * @nb_min: Notifier block for DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY
>>>> + * @nb_max: Notifier block for DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY
>>>> *
>>>> * This structure stores the devfreq information for a give device.
>>>> *
>>>> * Note that when a governor accesses entries in struct devfreq in its
>>>> * functions except for the context of callbacks defined in struct
>>>> @@ -176,10 +178,13 @@ struct devfreq {
>>>> unsigned int *trans_table;
>>>> unsigned long *time_in_state;
>>>> unsigned long last_stat_updated;
>>>>
>>>> struct srcu_notifier_head transition_notifier_list;
>>>> +
>>>> + struct notifier_block nb_min;
>>>> + struct notifier_block nb_max;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct devfreq_freqs {
>>>> unsigned long old;
>>>> unsigned long new;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190924101140epcas1p4abeedf42f223e65f58c88a0ddf1e4e56@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] PM / devfreq: Add dev_pm_qos support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] PM / devfreq: Don't fail devfreq_dev_release if not in list Leonard Crestez
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration Leonard Crestez
2019-09-25 1:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] PM / devfreq: Don't take lock in devfreq_add_device Leonard Crestez
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] PM / devfreq: Introduce get_freq_range helper Leonard Crestez
2019-09-25 1:37 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 20:55 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-26 1:06 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-26 14:03 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] PM / devfreq: Add PM QoS support Leonard Crestez
2019-09-24 19:11 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-24 19:22 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-25 2:17 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 19:40 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-26 1:08 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 2:15 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 16:06 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-25 21:18 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-26 1:12 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-26 13:43 ` Leonard Crestez [this message]
2019-09-27 1:49 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-30 13:16 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-30 21:42 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-10-01 9:39 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-10-01 21:55 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-26 1:19 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-30 12:43 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-30 21:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] PM / devfreq: Use PM QoS for sysfs min/max_freq Leonard Crestez
2019-09-25 2:41 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 16:45 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-26 1:25 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-26 16:04 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-27 1:58 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 22:11 ` Leonard Crestez
2019-09-26 1:26 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 1:44 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] PM / devfreq: Add dev_pm_qos support Chanwoo Choi
2019-09-25 19:37 ` Leonard Crestez
[not found] ` <CGME20190924101139epcas1p4c6799a5de9bdb4e90abb74de1e881388@epcms1p4>
2019-09-25 1:58 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] PM / devfreq: Move more initialization before registration MyungJoo Ham
2019-09-25 19:33 ` Leonard Crestez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB702397D04A0F2FFE8111E341EE860@VI1PR04MB7023.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
--cc=a.swigon@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=abailon@baylibre.com \
--cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=l.luba@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).