From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Boot failure regression on 6.0.10 stable kernel on iMX7
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:03:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4iKAUav9ktuxncE@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fef2598e-e5fc-c4fc-0530-2d3c380ed39a@denx.de>
+ MTD maintainers/list
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:59:04PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/30/22 21:51, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:41:13PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 11/30/22 14:52, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > > [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> > > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.0.10 (francesco@francesco-nb) (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) 9.
> > > > 4.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.34) #36 SMP Wed Nov 30 14:07:15 CET 2022
> > > > ...
> > > > [ 4.407499] gpmi-nand: error parsing ofpart partition /soc/nand-controller@33002000/partition@0 (/soc/nand-controller
> > > > @33002000)
> > > > [ 4.438401] gpmi-nand 33002000.nand-controller: driver registered.
> > > > ...
> > > > [ 5.933906] VFS: Cannot open root device "ubi0:rootfs" or unknown-block(0,0): error -19
> > > > [ 5.946504] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Any idea? I'm not familiar with the gpmi-nand driver and I would just revert it, but
> > > > maybe you have a better idea.
> > >
> > > Can you share the relevant snippet of your nand controller DT node ?
> >
> > We just have
> >
> > from imx7-colibri.dtsi,
> >
> > &gpmi {
> > fsl,use-minimum-ecc;
> > nand-ecc-mode = "hw";
> > nand-on-flash-bbt;
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpmi_nand>;
> > };
> >
> > OF partition are created by U-Boot from
> > mtdparts=mtdparts=gpmi-nand:512k(mx7-bcb),1536k(u-boot1)ro,1536k(u-boot2)ro,512k(u-boot-env),-(ubi)
> > env variables calling fdt_fixup_mtdparts from colibri_imx7.c
> >
> > Everything is available in the upstream Linux/U-Boot git, no downstream
> > repo of any sort.
> >
> > > Probably up to first partition is enough. I suspect you need to fill in the
> > > correct address-cells/size-cells there, which might be currently missing in
> > > your DT and worked by chance.
> >
> > This is generated by U-Boot, I would need to dump what he did generate
> > from the standard fdt_fixup_mtdparts(). I will try to do it tomorrow
> > unless what I wrote here is already enough to understand what's going
> > on.
>
> Oh drat ... I see. It's the u-boot fdt_node_set_part_info() which checks the
> current NAND controller #size-cells and uses that when generating MTD
> partitions 'reg' properties. Since #size-cells is now zero, the reg
> properties would be malformed.
I think the issue is slightly different, the u-boot code checks it and
if not set it defaults to #size-cells = <1>. Said that u-boot
never set #size-cells anywhere.
What is failing is ofpart_core.c:parse_fixed_partitions() in Linux with
#size-cells = <0>.
> Now, what I am unsure is whether the right fix is to update mx7 colibri DT
> and include &gpmi { #size-cells=<1>; }; , or , revert this patch. The former
> fixes the problem for colibri and retains the correct #size-cells=<0>
> behavior for any other board which does not specify MTD partitions in the
> GPMI NAND node. The later also covers boards which we don't know about which
> might also use generated MTD partitions in DT using fdt_fixup_mtdparts() in
> U-Boot, but I am not convinced that is correct.
>
> So, would you be OK with fixing up the colibri mx7 DT with #size-cells=<1> ?
I am also not sure what is the right fix, however I am convinced that
the fix needs to be in Linux, we cannot really break the boot flow.
In a very pragmatic way I could just add the property to colibri-imx7
dtsi, but we are really breaking potential other users of it, anybody
using U-Boot to generate the partitions in the end ... (and the list is
not empty and not just the colibri*).
Would it make any sense to do something like that (untested!) ?
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/ofpart_core.c b/drivers/mtd/parsers/ofpart_core.c
index 192190c42fc8..fffd60acd926 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/ofpart_core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/ofpart_core.c
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static int parse_fixed_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
a_cells = of_n_addr_cells(pp);
s_cells = of_n_size_cells(pp);
+ if (s_cells == 0)
+ s_cells = 1; // for backward compatibility
if (len / 4 != a_cells + s_cells) {
pr_debug("%s: ofpart partition %pOF (%pOF) error parsing reg property.\n",
master->name, pp,
Francesco
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-30 13:52 Boot failure regression on 6.0.10 stable kernel on iMX7 Francesco Dolcini
2022-11-30 14:41 ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-30 20:51 ` Francesco Dolcini
2022-11-30 22:59 ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-01 11:03 ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2022-12-01 11:25 ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-01 15:45 ` Francesco Dolcini
2022-12-01 22:00 ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-01 12:06 ` Boot failure regression on 6.0.10 stable kernel on iMX7 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4iKAUav9ktuxncE@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com \
--to=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).