From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81AAC433DB for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4915B64E2A for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:35:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4915B64E2A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=0eaAGMHdJmHBsrtB73ZJXwf+OOYSzJTVs99RwGBmReE=; b=zvGrRbO2MPDPXsX2UVOcuwngm Prw/2VjAK0IM5pzOQ//7k6VaeTGm4PE0shCN2YV6Tyx53c/N1EisulxgqMhiQqbR+o9yZJdb43s6i e+sPkvUUSQrAgO4TJgihCI5Licdo8+hvPbfWi9rUEv7q5wDwyVAEZKcetIyI7xVrW/SNBJmUlUKcl 9L+1Am/smCnejrtrfADBazuWLGW39EapCnI0XNxF85cUC6LTs8vtxa+2VsDtB9X1kTsLYq1IjeDSh gJk3roE+bUiExsUTSsYpDMOxTCWlure60vZKv2iVmSK/Dhvm5eEIekrUrXk4266aaz1x6UpntRPF4 1WJhNI+Gw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l8gSY-0005Kz-T2; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 09:34:26 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l8gSW-0005KY-Jc; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 09:34:25 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D72364E2A; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:34:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1612690462; bh=vHdplIXe2RStxmKLVaI73uahI+H48WMD9Z6xwvPREOM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GA/UugZBRdxo19A6s+kxnmLYt1SAraTqqy+qtZGDoDGBadsBnv9WRNv/5kN2nKcNH ZG6VqjBDUysIN8Z+S7aj6UwU7ES0p+Icio6RJ/+5COw0I6i8uTq+s2Njpe6vtvY1QN G9dHiZBV26PMMg8Nv6cmeNwIrGuQdj7mjAQNhL20= Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:34:18 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Youling Tang Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fix ignoring return value warning Message-ID: References: <1612689808-30985-1-git-send-email-tangyouling@loongson.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1612689808-30985-1-git-send-email-tangyouling@loongson.cn> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210207_043424_824287_797E3377 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.85 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Matthias Brugger , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 05:23:28PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote: > Fix the below ignoring return value warning for device_reset. > > drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c:685:2: warning: ignoring return value > of function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Wunused-result] > device_reset(&pdev->dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c:836:2: warning: ignoring return value > of function declared with 'warn_unused_result' attribute [-Wunused-result] > device_reset(&pdev->dev); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ > > Signed-off-by: Youling Tang > --- > drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c | 6 +++++- > drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c | 6 +++++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c > index bc4bb43..d4ffa52 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-dma/mtk-hsdma.c > @@ -682,7 +682,11 @@ static int mtk_hsdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return ret; > } > > - device_reset(&pdev->dev); > + ret = device_reset(&pdev->dev); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to reset device\n"); > + return ret; > + } > > dd = &hsdma->ddev; > dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dd->cap_mask); > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c b/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c > index 655df31..df99c47 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/ralink-gdma/ralink-gdma.c > @@ -833,7 +833,11 @@ static int gdma_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return ret; > } > > - device_reset(&pdev->dev); > + ret = device_reset(&pdev->dev); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to reset device\n"); > + return ret; > + } > > dd = &dma_dev->ddev; > dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dd->cap_mask); > -- > 2.1.0 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch did not apply to any known trees that Greg is in control of. Possibly this is because you made it against Linus's tree, not the linux-next tree, which is where all of the development for the next version of the kernel is at. Please refresh your patch against the linux-next tree, or even better yet, the development tree specified in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem you are submitting a patch for, and resend it. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel