* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2020-10-12 15:47 [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-11-09 12:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-21 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-11-09 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:47:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Any comment on this?
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> index c50e383358c4..f3bb8a2bf788 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
> #ifndef _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
> #define _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
>
> -#if CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO > 0
> -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO
> -#endif
> -
> /* Note: this may rely upon the value of ARCH_NR_GPIOS set in mach/gpio.h */
> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2020-10-12 15:47 [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-09 12:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2021-01-21 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-24 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-02 15:51 ` Linus Walleij
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-01-21 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:47:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Can we get this proceed somehow?
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> index c50e383358c4..f3bb8a2bf788 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
> #ifndef _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
> #define _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
>
> -#if CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO > 0
> -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO
> -#endif
> -
> /* Note: this may rely upon the value of ARCH_NR_GPIOS set in mach/gpio.h */
> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2020-10-12 15:47 [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-09 12:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-21 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2021-02-24 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-01 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-02 15:51 ` Linus Walleij
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-02-24 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King, linux-arm-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:47:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Any comment on this anybody?
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> index c50e383358c4..f3bb8a2bf788 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
> #ifndef _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
> #define _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
>
> -#if CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO > 0
> -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO
> -#endif
> -
> /* Note: this may rely upon the value of ARCH_NR_GPIOS set in mach/gpio.h */
> #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2021-02-24 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2021-03-01 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-03-01 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, Russell King, linux-arm Mailing List, linux-gpio
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 4:21 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 06:47:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> > hence drop unnecessary duplication.
>
> Any comment on this anybody?
+Cc: Linus and Arnd, maybe you can help to advance this to somewhere?
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> > index c50e383358c4..f3bb8a2bf788 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h
> > @@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
> > #ifndef _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
> > #define _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H
> >
> > -#if CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO > 0
> > -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO
> > -#endif
> > -
> > /* Note: this may rely upon the value of ARCH_NR_GPIOS set in mach/gpio.h */
> > #include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
> >
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2020-10-12 15:47 [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition Andy Shevchenko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-24 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2021-03-02 15:51 ` Linus Walleij
2021-05-10 11:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2021-03-02 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: Russell King, Linux ARM, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> hence drop unnecessary duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
sorry for extremely slow reply.
I think we could merge this into the GPIO tree if Russell is OK with it,
alternatively put it in Russell's patch tracker. It looks absolutely correct.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
2021-03-02 15:51 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2021-05-10 11:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2021-05-10 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij; +Cc: Russell King, Linux ARM, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:51:37PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The conditional by the generic header is the same,
> > hence drop unnecessary duplication.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
> sorry for extremely slow reply.
>
> I think we could merge this into the GPIO tree if Russell is OK with it,
> alternatively put it in Russell's patch tracker. It looks absolutely correct.
I have sent a v2 (same patch, just in case somebody lost this thread).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread