linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] remoteproc: Add support for detach-only during shutdown
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 23:11:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLBtbHevzyxT4RTK@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210522000309.26134-3-s-anna@ti.com>

On Fri 21 May 19:03 CDT 2021, Suman Anna wrote:

> The remoteproc core has support for both stopping and detaching a
> remote processor that was attached to previously, through both the
> remoteproc sysfs and cdev interfaces. The rproc_shutdown() though
> unconditionally only uses the stop functionality at present. This
> may not be the default desired functionality for all the remoteproc
> platform drivers.
> 
> Introduce a new rproc state flag 'detach_on_shutdown' that individual
> remoteproc drivers can set to only allow detach in rproc_shutdown()
> that would have been invoked when the driver is uninstalled, so that
> remote processor continues to run undisturbed even after the driver
> removal.
> 

I dislike the introduction of knobs for everything and would much rather
see that we define some sound defaults. Can we make shutdown just do
detach() if that's supported otherwise stop().

This still allows userspace to explicitly stop the detachable remoteproc
before shutdown, if for some reason that's what you want...

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c  | 7 +++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c  | 5 ++++-
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 6 ++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h            | 3 +++
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
> index 0b8a84c04f76..473467711a09 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
>  		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED &&
> +		    rproc->detach_on_shutdown) {
> +			dev_err(&rproc->dev,
> +				"stop not supported for this rproc, use detach\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
>  	} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "detach", len)) {
>  		if (rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 6019f46001c8..e8ab3eb41f00 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2074,7 +2074,10 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, false);
> +	if (rproc->detach_on_shutdown && rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED)
> +		ret = __rproc_detach(rproc);
> +	else
> +		ret = rproc_stop(rproc, false);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		atomic_inc(&rproc->power);
>  		goto out;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> index ea8b89f97d7b..1785fbcb1075 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
>  		    rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED &&
> +		    rproc->detach_on_shutdown) {
> +			dev_err(&rproc->dev, "stop not supported for this rproc, use detach\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
>  	} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "detach")) {
>  		if (rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 42a1f30e33a7..35ef921676a1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -530,6 +530,8 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>   * @elf_machine: firmware ELF machine
>   * @cdev: character device of the rproc
>   * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
> + * @detach_on_shutdown: flag to indicate if remoteproc cannot be shutdown in
> + *			attached state and _only_ support detach
>   */
>  struct rproc {
>  	struct list_head node;
> @@ -569,6 +571,7 @@ struct rproc {
>  	u16 elf_machine;
>  	struct cdev cdev;
>  	bool cdev_put_on_release;
> +	bool detach_on_shutdown;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.30.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-28  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-22  0:03 [PATCH 0/6] K3 R5F & DSP IPC-only mode support Suman Anna
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_detach_device() wrapper Suman Anna
2021-05-28  4:17   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-28 16:17     ` Suman Anna
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] remoteproc: Add support for detach-only during shutdown Suman Anna
2021-05-28  4:11   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-05-28 16:40     ` Suman Anna
2021-06-01 17:15       ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] remoteproc: k3-r5: Refactor mbox request code in start Suman Anna
2021-06-01 17:22   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs Suman Anna
2021-06-01 17:51   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-06-02 15:53   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Refactor mbox request code in start Suman Anna
2021-06-02 16:04   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-05-22  0:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add support for IPC-only mode for all K3 DSPs Suman Anna
2021-05-28  4:36   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-28 17:04     ` Suman Anna
2021-06-02 16:07   ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-06-03 14:57     ` Suman Anna
2021-06-07 16:33       ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-06-16 15:00         ` Suman Anna
2021-06-22 22:51           ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLBtbHevzyxT4RTK@builder.lan \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).