From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ADFC6377B for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDC461263 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:11:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2BDC461263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=K/8shd8Jnm5OVWWIEIpG4qwr2uK4OzRUN8Ec1MGhC/E=; b=hYJD3joMYRYqi3 bq5LgW4PKcvb9fdMsHmZPXdwCSFxi4bOvx1tHGPEab/rUwdeAsMlbGQBzdrzbyi69C2jTWq0oL4eE rGd4NJexMBCfq3uPgWuQ5SW2vh+xbq1KayygoGvnCm2UQA36RU/rGE5cSzZL1XLQNaTMDq9Bl01jU 5FI9+zNBRb1BPAt5ppeSCgI4qUKH9YAdLj1w4HcHlJC+se7TS+F39YQgB/xPld0UCXsnBKFEgcUlA vRmlAvcMf0/C+sU0IUJywcuhpPS1vW+Ux9Zmdzl9zLTr0+MZaR/UM3NW29NiZ03mhg+RkIm0u5gZP PbuBtu5/HGvC6AZrdZIQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6IXL-00H4Fk-AV; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:09:47 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6IXF-00H4E8-KX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:09:45 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id f93-20020a9d03e60000b02904b1f1d7c5f4so3186877otf.9 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ryhmjqV2eKLpoirk/rnB/jmjc8Sw5eUN/kn6KkHMSG8=; b=f0V8sZc4aqzvTzm9SSyhFzpvTL6ZdbVxPHsnzMtxQXlcraRxoiKzAZYUxg1zQwSw0L 0t4aBZCwG3QntHJ9LRlAimJWvfxMAU79KZMV6rNopHZb+wI3BjQxhxb6zZ9MbyMmLz/K 5puTHinQ8S3T01ksLF63skMaFBcnizWmH9zM0DUWtkZ/I5qRcjVXZQfuFGP1nr9I4kCk h9l9QMx8FExuaYAHmgnlfrOxarqJ1RNdIjLP01lXcV3Qherns4JHvRqCam3cwqEk5JSf wLuGPWm+XbxRoEEVkPbJb5r0jR6y8KTtPriJAR6NomLoou0BKAiRUdAqCS40y9o7qSwi L2Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ryhmjqV2eKLpoirk/rnB/jmjc8Sw5eUN/kn6KkHMSG8=; b=Qnjq7G8rfdyCp2jfXzDXVmLbmgiXVQdiLwfwvhgv6bLs12FA6enKPa7wkSEeZih1x5 u8ey6GzjyOSL8mLulYt0eMZ9krgXPBgzUZqXUAe2jmFbqxsikK8vWSzRl8R3E8btfxQG 8No+oax5QNvFYVeaqfr3l4igQgFp7uANEU8r6gbUgKOHf0XcpQDQ8aOhfFkqhhWan14G CP/s3OR33e414cHTNI/xwR5sSoqAMRxKaMPE2lovgvYPJaGL9QVIHv4HTe2dV/xsjYiz JkrMgsZw9wzA4t8MDoIUV+qauKxW78VkJhCCXPeG9Ies/VqQNq0uzDX4zM3TBreIAg8n PYCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vxJx6ITQhZrHweUCzJauSvmzdsIn2vhTER6bYIM9/4GG62ICq X9GNg3UhBQGKBK9oFkZSHn64zA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/FxM5/zumxzNaWfIehVZW2nKUlw7DpxOp2p3sgrCBOL4NDneF4Gn+AdrfqtxLQvtaMfgcJw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5e15:: with SMTP id d21mr28331811oti.280.1626898179791; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoga (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o26sm4900456otk.77.2021.07.21.13.09.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:09:37 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Serge Semin , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Serge Semin , John Stultz , Felipe Balbi , Florian Fainelli , Andy Gross , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-arm-msm , Linux USB List , lkml , linux-arm-kernel , Amit Pundir Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/29] arm64: dts: qcom: Harmonize DWC USB3 DT nodes name Message-ID: References: <20201020115959.2658-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20201020115959.2658-30-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20210714124807.o22mottsrg3tv6nt@mobilestation> <20210721100220.ddfxwugivsndsedv@mobilestation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210721_130941_806001_44FDF81F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 57.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed 21 Jul 05:29 CDT 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 01:02:20PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > @Krzysztof, @Rob, please join the discussion so to finally get done > > with the concerned issue. > > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:48:07PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > Hello John, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:07:00PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 5:10 AM Serge Semin > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In accordance with the DWC USB3 bindings the corresponding node > > > > > > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which > > > > > > requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp: > > > > > > "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "snps,dwc3"-compatible nodes are correctly > > > > > > named. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know folks like to ignore this, but this patch breaks AOSP on db845c. :( > > > > > > > > Sorry to hear that. Alas there is no much can be done about it. > > > > > > Yes there is, we can revert the change. We do not break existing > > > configurations, sorry. > > > > By reverting this patch we'll get back to the broken dt-bindings > > since it won't comply to the current USB DT-nodes requirements > > which at this state well describe the latest DT spec: > > https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/tag/v0.3 > > Thus the dtbs_check will fail for these nodes. > > > > Originally this whole patchset was connected with finally getting the > > DT-node names in order to comply with the standard requirement and it > > was successful mostly except a few patches which still haven't been > > merged in. > > > > Anyway @Krzysztof has already responded to the complain regarding this > > issue here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201221210423.GA2504@kozik-lap/ > > but noone cared to respond on his reasonable questions in order to > > get to a suitable solution for everyone. Instead we are > > getting another email with the same request to revert the changes. > > Here is the quote from the Krzysztof email so we could continue the > > discussion: > > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:04:27 -0800 (PST), Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:24:11PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 3:06 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > The node names are not part of an ABI, are they? I expect only > > > > > compatibles and properties to be stable. If user-space looks for > > > > > something by name, it's a user-space's mistake. Not mentioning that you > > > > > also look for specific address... Imagine remapping of addresses with > > > > > ranges (for whatever reason) - AOSP also would be broken? Addresses are > > > > > definitely not an ABI. > > > > > > > > Though that is how it's exported through sysfs. > > > > > > The ABI is the format of sysfs file for example in /sys/devices. However > > > the ABI is not the exact address or node name of each device. > > > > > > > In AOSP it is then used to setup the configfs gadget by writing that > > > > value into /config/usb_gadget/g1/UDC. > > > > > > > > Given there may be multiple controllers on a device, or even if its > > > > just one and the dummy hcd driver is enabled, I'm not sure how folks > > > > reference the "right" one without the node name? > > > > > > I think it is the same type of problem as for all other subsystems, e.g. > > > mmc, hwmon/iio. They usually solve it either with aliases or with > > > special property with the name/label. > > > > > > > I understand the fuzziness with sysfs ABI, and I get that having > > > > consistent naming is important, but like the eth0 -> enp3s0 changes, > > > > it seems like this is going to break things. > > > > > > One could argue whether interface name is or is not ABI. But please tell > > > me how the address of a device in one's representation (for example DT) > > > is a part of a stable interface? > > > > > > > Greg? Is there some better way AOSP should be doing this? > > > > > > If you need to find specific device, maybe go through the given bus and > > > check compatibles? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Krzysztof > > > > So the main question is how is the DT-node really connected with ABI > > and is supposed to be stable in that concern? > > > > As I see it even if it affects the configfs node name, then we may > > either need to break that connection and somehow deliver DT-node-name > > independent interface to the user-space or we have no choice but to > > export the node with an updated name and ask of user-space to deal > > with it. In both suggested cases the DT-node name will still conform > > to the USB-node name DT spec. Currently we are at the second one. > > I really do not care what you all decide on, but you CAN NOT break > existing working systems, sorry. That is why I have reverted this > change in my tree and will send it to Linus soon. > Which tree did you revert this in? 5.13.stable?) I'm onboard with us reverting this, but for any 5.14-rc and 5.15 this will conflict badly with the qcom tree, so I much rather take the revert in my tree - than have Linus run into this mess down the road. For stable, I don't mind if you merge something...Perhaps you can point me to your revert and I can pick it up in my tree? Regards, Bjorn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel