From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5EC0C433F5 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:02:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Nu2/Zp9tNkAWW0Fvz8Gbl6jV4qKwTntKBShu+oRYFSY=; b=eeWnUVk5QTt9pE EI89etlF7lLmdjQdx/WeDUPMD01XOARzOg8ksZDMDF2AHNKrLLf5NiZkFGSkia3X+TYJi1C8PNlCJ usrQ+DblhxYwmECu9AVvJJ9vI8/EC9zv5pV6WKIf0LEiqVEVpO+smWjM3UahkNzx0d4dkWGi8Ng4E EwI/lqs0dTADD/kKTTTkh4obVz/P8Kbew5EQR0oZWgvsy+2IEgDLW7bJRELrE5DXO8x3tvyPJwTXa s60hVy+/ZMkUrlC/Om35vfh0faADFcpM3sHaYzXMaq2pESVV/vzSDtztKrMovt5m5fgqZ6i2Z91WU QTzBmkK+bn9/9AjL4djg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nUmvz-00FbU4-3H; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:00:43 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nUmvv-00FbTi-Iq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:00:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1147560A23; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4800DC340E9; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:00:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1647511238; bh=nIQAfyLtMOlcWp2si2HWrzsIfDL6gt9n50szSVrLy2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nEh9kbCYAy6hA8BF87HNd//3k4drXyku27Bv9YKtWGZ+XnnVrqXHRo9bdE/pKZg0J l1YRp32YyautPSgwozx6B12VuB4F0V9LylybPpWlQ22Pw+t39TpKau1sOlQtWcXSCl aAEuL8d8+16L+4Epj0jANR1f5ITp2X/xaDQRIpCo= Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:00:33 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Sasha Levin Cc: James Morse , stable@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [stable:PATCH v5.4.184 00/22] arm64: Mitigate spectre style branch history side channels Message-ID: References: <20220315182415.3900464-1-james.morse@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220317_030039_685069_6394EDDA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:41:07AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:23:53PM +0000, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Here is the state of the current v5.4 backport. Now that the 32bit > > code has been merged, it doesn't conflict when KVM's shared 32bit/64bit > > code needs to use these constants. > > > > I've fixed the two issues that were reported against the v5.10 backport. > > > > I had a go at bringing all the pre-requisites in to add proton-pack.c > > to v5.4. Its currently 39 patches: > > https://git.gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm.git /bhb/alternative_backport/UNTESTED/v5.4.183 > > (or for web browsers: > > https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-jm/-/commits/bhb/alternative_backport/UNTESTED/v5.4.183/ > > ) > > I've queued it up. Thanks for merging these, and James, thanks for the backports! I agree, this way is a bit "simpler", but thanks for trying the other way as well. Does this mean that the 4.19 and older backports will be easier? greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel