linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Add PG_arch_3 page flag
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:39:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yynewxzc6Zy8ls0N@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rmfkzbu.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 07:12:53PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 18:01:55 +0100,
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > Peter, please let me know if you want to pick this series up together
> > with your other KVM patches. Otherwise I can post it separately, it's
> > worth merging it on its own as it clarifies the page flag vs tag setting
> > ordering.
> 
> I'm looking at queuing this, but I'm confused by this comment. Do I
> need to pick this as part of the series? Or is this an independent
> thing (my hunch is that it is actually required not to break other
> architectures...).

This series series (at least the first patches) won't apply cleanly on
top of 6.0-rc1 and, of course, we shouldn't break other architectures. I
can repost the whole series but I don't have the setup to test the
MAP_SHARED KVM option (unless Peter plans to post it soon).

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 19:30 [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: arm64: permit MAP_SHARED mappings with MTE enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: mte: Fix/clarify the PG_mte_tagged semantics Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-01 15:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 10:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] KVM: arm64: Simplify the sanitise_mte_tags() logic Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Add PG_arch_3 page flag Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-11  7:16   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-01 17:59     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05 17:01       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-19 18:12         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 15:39           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-09-20 16:33             ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 16:58               ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-21  3:53                 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: mte: Lock a page for MTE tag initialisation Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 16:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:58       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05  7:37         ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in memslots when MTE is enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: arm64: permit all VM_MTE_ALLOWED mappings with MTE enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-12 16:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-13  4:10     ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] Documentation: document the ABI changes for KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: arm64: permit MAP_SHARED mappings with MTE enabled Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yynewxzc6Zy8ls0N@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).