linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
	dianders@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/23] iommu/arm-smmu: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:09:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0689d30-2214-c92e-8387-8f1d3b22909b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YP6ukfewNVjgS/bt@8bytes.org>

On 2021-07-26 13:46, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 07:20:27PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> -	if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA && using_legacy_binding)
>> +	if ((type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_API) && using_legacy_binding)
> 
> Hmm, I wonder whether it is time to introduce helpers for these checks?
> 
> Something like iommu_domain_is_dma() is more readable.

Ha, I had exactly that at one point, except I think in the order of 
iommu_is_dma_domain() :)

The end result didn't seem to give enough extra clarity to justify the 
header churn for me, but I'm happy to be wrong about that if you prefer.

Cheers,
Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 18:20 [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 01/23] iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 02/23] iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 03/23] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 04/23] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 05/23] iommu/exynos: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 06/23] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 07/23] iommu/mtk: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 08/23] iommu/rockchip: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 09/23] iommu/sprd: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 10/23] iommu/sun50i: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 11/23] iommu/virtio: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 12/23] iommu/dma: Unexport " Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 13/23] iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks Robin Murphy
2021-07-26  8:28   ` John Garry
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 14/23] iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 15/23] iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 16/23] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 12:46   ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-26 13:09     ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-07-26 18:43       ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 17/23] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 16:44   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 17:30     ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-22 18:44   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24  5:23   ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26  8:30     ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 18/23] iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type Robin Murphy
2021-07-24  5:29   ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26  8:27     ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 11:31       ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 12:29       ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-26 12:43         ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 19/23] iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 20/23] iommu: Allow choosing DMA strictness at build time Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 21/23] iommu/dma: Factor out flush queue init Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 22/23] iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically Robin Murphy
2021-07-21 18:20 ` [PATCH 23/23] iommu/arm-smmu: Allow non-strict in pgtable_quirks interface Robin Murphy
2021-07-26  8:13 ` [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness John Garry
2021-07-26 12:06   ` Robin Murphy
2021-07-26 13:02 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0689d30-2214-c92e-8387-8f1d3b22909b@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).