From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Report USF more clearly
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a33b166d-dbfa-7791-0a36-b7deda1fc03d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2762ffd4c196dc91d62e10eb8b753f256ea9b629.1568375317.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On 13/09/2019 12:48, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Although CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_DISABLE_BYPASS_BY_DEFAULT is a welcome tool
> for smoking out inadequate firmware, the failure mode is non-obvious
> and can be confusing for end users. Add some special-case reporting of
> Unidentified Stream Faults to help clarify this particular symptom.
>
> CC: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index b7cf24402a94..76ac8c180695 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,11 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_global_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> "\tGFSR 0x%08x, GFSYNR0 0x%08x, GFSYNR1 0x%08x, GFSYNR2 0x%08x\n",
> gfsr, gfsynr0, gfsynr1, gfsynr2);
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_DISABLE_BYPASS_BY_DEFAULT) &&
> + (gfsr & sGFSR_USF))
> + dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> + "Stream ID %hu may not be described by firmware, try booting with \"arm-smmu.disable_bypass=0\"\n",
> + (u16)gfsynr1);
>
> arm_smmu_gr0_write(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR, gfsr);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> index c9c13b5785f2..46f7e161e83e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@
> #define ID7_MINOR GENMASK(3, 0)
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR 0x48
> +#define sGFSR_USF BIT(2)
Sigh... and of course what I actually meant here was that this is the
2nd bit, which is bit 1, which is also 2. I blame Friday :(
Robin.
> +
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR0 0x50
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR1 0x54
> #define ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSYNR2 0x58
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-13 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 11:48 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Report USF more clearly Robin Murphy
2019-09-13 14:34 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-09-13 14:35 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-13 14:43 ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-13 22:44 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-16 18:00 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-16 18:19 ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-16 21:42 ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-13 22:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a33b166d-dbfa-7791-0a36-b7deda1fc03d@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).