From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2D6C282C3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A37A21872 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LNGTjWLv"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=microchiptechnology.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@microchiptechnology.onmicrosoft.com header.b="BFHkNe/j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A37A21872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Content-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=pPg4JPyQloeEVVHQaf6nwqQJ9UToqTRdk8VCGSpTci0=; b=LNGTjWLv5Yrtdd BNqcYnq5aQ8mfDQ35OtQN6jTbG8Qz6jbQ4S1E+pe8TzPwacfL/tKuCNI9yBV88vZtUP0vh8+OShCN klAN1oQXL2RM+mJNG8BGdpzWrsIGGotuC6H1HnSFuNKgidjIfqAPMxW+niV5aUKvbl0QRTkR9fCZV zg82BQWzUpquZh1wE+0NEwePgxDb5uol8oUrue/ON6vIKHYXuXS7BL7pFwGD9R0JvR0RFfsy5EU2g 19X3A5NLu9zPQDs3X0TGT+r2zzyoAXLKDvoFv+089X0cXDlpXYDELwrCQgCDprmKtUtam2fJ5GSDJ X0UDsQcj1epg/PJmaDAw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gmcLe-0004d3-EJ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:35:02 +0000 Received: from esa1.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.147.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gmcLZ-0004bv-GG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:35:00 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,515,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="26827529" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Jan 2019 03:34:53 -0700 Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.10.215.89) by email.microchip.com (10.10.76.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.352.0; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 03:34:53 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microchiptechnology.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-microchiptechnology-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=f30V+qbfBuV88b2q2Qp9GmqMjvJnFu56HwNB0lPWQ5E=; b=BFHkNe/jF2GY46Xw3Wur2+Uu/2fisIRdOAajC0nL5g+u6+IddjGemaKh79GULoo7IvxLxcbNtg/gSEJJjwBi5VeWP+hjSGrlomlybZKQT0UBFyb4X19OG6jLmY+vy+32n8FkV/68ZEBa4ySIzCP82hbou7JwPOXNdV/MshNkxPk= Received: from MWHPR11MB1662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.55.15) by MWHPR11MB2013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.169.234.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.16; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000 Received: from MWHPR11MB1662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::890b:3c0f:a8f4:5de5]) by MWHPR11MB1662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::890b:3c0f:a8f4:5de5%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1537.031; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000 From: To: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC Thread-Topic: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC Thread-Index: AQHUs8tdXETHJiEk9kOBJGz8hjKFtqW+OTyA Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:34:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7e68a0298b8802edaead1f9c011f9c2e191ecf6a.1547629763.git.nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> <20190123183443.ppxdfstmau2xtodi@earth.universe> In-Reply-To: <20190123183443.ppxdfstmau2xtodi@earth.universe> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: CWLP123CA0056.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:401:59::20) To MWHPR11MB1662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:e::15) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [195.6.168.232] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR11MB2013; 6:3c/iXhypUXK75R2d4DM04cHaLT4NDEFY7tfgUOczIeO8cKyXIymlC4axLSDeqr+r1SKFNYox8wXing7/yGSgjxHfwBtkGV2JAXK1C2RzMau4IqPhVBeVaWaTurEa6794e37QGr31YuNJzO90h2G4FG0/pGHMxquCcTfADXbAPQTV6xKvQ8tqTRi17UOtJSuhlgZsOjn/7f95r3pRDYocttq/bDkZm7yg3N4k/UKc/fChiWXfhWGuVDFO4HuzEYd1KiVCJ9D21JGDr4LMMtvRiTIsl24mOtSQrlIO2PAcWkorys2yrtMvB/pTAzJ/O1K+4/zk8srG8O/DcoVdahrbxU/4koVkd0rSPUk3eD5ubCarvvQeuGGIDcRtMrTW2lOpwIgtAdiN2p8GWH9p227ojuumfFVEW8LO0WCkOwkroSxcdT7JLa45YszDn+ekVsdEOCnVSMzkbMEoIeTW6yO6LA==; 5:7dexNYkWGlcBw/w2R+w7VmHePZUZdq4lAeSI1dq9fD58H7P8ZU9LA0QUAqx5IDHOI83VqiCNHTse1cPNuGUO7FojoJP0MaqjtwCIvOylTc95cxrSsJjYEBvvE+Z8JKQ3bPAeqlgEf7L03z/GrufK9VAlUzDAY3N5CVPwGo+BXTujy2spvosaP4R293BKgkqD+KWjAaIl4LEH1nNG9lIHwQ==; 7:C8YhkDRaDYK5eqAISAjo8WsS5RdBDlKnMVEKjJzNTWLtdiXY+txC+PQQwCeCebEwoe/9lD96bd8fc8RrnbzwMmvL4YBdjgYwwIwxJ8PSs/nAA78ynrZVle0uz0HiJ12Vs3QRQcAfYToAnA5DmwHEVw== x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3c7628c7-6b10-47b8-0c3d-08d681e79195 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR11MB2013; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB2013: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-forefront-prvs: 0927AA37C7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(52116002)(97736004)(106356001)(486006)(7736002)(31696002)(76176011)(105586002)(31686004)(86362001)(446003)(72206003)(68736007)(305945005)(6512007)(8676002)(14454004)(81156014)(53936002)(186003)(26005)(66066001)(478600001)(102836004)(36756003)(53546011)(81166006)(71190400001)(316002)(6116002)(2906002)(7416002)(71200400001)(8936002)(386003)(6246003)(25786009)(6436002)(6486002)(229853002)(99286004)(6916009)(11346002)(476003)(6506007)(2616005)(54906003)(3846002)(256004)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR11MB2013; H:MWHPR11MB1662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microchip.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ZVBOIF6faSWg6RX88/Sv4MbVhy81dorWf9LToTBjOf5nY6nVKgPLiOxfL9z/xttYYDxtATcQWkGvxbydGOD2QHgAJsYkozcomeDHVyAHV6KoJGhmUi1DcArcC9bEEWfpi2JUYP2zq9gKgzUfPQxqAMvZ0qDaJ7kM88up2fpmlIeYr83M18gnxy6ujoLh3QVYIFXkv2TehOor05e97xndgEK+fj1brNJFONua8Tz9dQVhV6b+C3tU90Hj4pSgmZo5MZjQGrHnIKlARIjJluhr/yXJJ9LPS7yaO52IoT3TrRe/92BsnMEp2O0DgyewcpSoYqsG37AVmlfaz2AjnKOU07Zvkv6hJhs6RvK79q12HaVFZ13vRM72SFYVKwiBXBKtsrXit2daBGPm2trI+OTUZgDs7Zg5jS3tEDtiU7ZESmg= spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-ID: <642BCDF518A7F14D94401399BB09A101@namprd11.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3c7628c7-6b10-47b8-0c3d-08d681e79195 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jan 2019 10:34:46.8682 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 3f4057f3-b418-4d4e-ba84-d55b4e897d88 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB2013 X-OriginatorOrg: microchip.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190124_023457_704821_320D74DC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Sebastian, On 23/01/2019 at 19:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility >> string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >> --- >> drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c >> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type { >> RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG = 2, >> RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE = 3, >> RESET_TYPE_USER = 4, >> + RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL = 6, >> + RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL = 7, >> + RESET_TYPE_ULP2 = 8, > > what happened to 5? :) That a good question ;-) It's marked as "Reserved"... which opens up a whole new field of speculation :-) [..] >> { .compatible = "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, >> + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data = samx7_restart }, >> { /* sentinel */ } >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match); > > Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that > Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback. What about merging this patch with the whole series through the at91 then arm-soc trees? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel