Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	rientjes@google.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shakeelb@google.com,
	kirill@shutemov.name, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 19:41:24 +0530
Message-ID: <a81dd27a-b7d1-ddad-e104-4ce51699ac3d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190114070137.GB21345@dhcp22.suse.cz>



On 01/14/2019 12:31 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 14-01-19 09:30:55, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/13/2019 11:05 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Sat 12-01-19 15:56:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>>>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>>>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>>>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>>>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>>>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>>
>>> I agree that some unification is due but GFP_PGTABLE is not something to
>>> expose in generic gfp.h IMHO. It just risks an abuse. I would be looking
>>
>> Why would you think that it risks an abuse ? It does not create new semantics
>> of allocation in the buddy. Its just uses existing GFP_KERNEL allocation which
>> is then getting zeroed out. The risks (if any) is exactly same as GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> Beucase my experience just tells me that people tend to use whatever
> they find and name fits what they think they need.
> 
>>> at providing asm-generic implementation and reuse it to remove the code
>>
>> Does that mean GFP_PGTABLE can be created but not in gfp.h but in some other
>> memory related header file ?
> 
> I would just keep it close to its users. If that is a single arch
> generic place then only better. But I suspect some arches have special
> requirements.

We can move the definition into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which can be
used by all archs. If there any special requirements those can be added on
this generic and common minimum allocation flag. The minimum required flag
should not be duplicated every where.

> 
>>> duplication. But I haven't tried that to know that it will work out due
>>> to small/subtle differences between arches.
>>
>> IIUC from the allocation perspective GFP_ACCOUNT is the only thing which gets
>> added with GFP_PGTABLE for user page table for memcg accounting purpose. There
>> does not seem to be any other differences unless I am missing something.
> 
> It's been some time since I've checked the last time. Some arches were
> using GPF_REPEAT (__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL) back then. I have removed most of
> those but some were doing a higher order allocations so they probably
> have stayed.

A simple grep shows that still there are some places which use the flag
__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. But that can be added on GFP_PGTABLE for these archs.

arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h:           (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h:       pte = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h:   page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL),
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c:            hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h:               GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h:               GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h:       pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c:      base = kmalloc(handle_size + 15, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-12 10:26 Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-12 12:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-12 12:55   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-12 13:49   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-01-12 15:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-12 16:50       ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-14  4:28       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-12 16:48 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-14  4:14   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-13 17:35 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-14  4:00   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-14  7:01     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-15 14:11       ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a81dd27a-b7d1-ddad-e104-4ce51699ac3d@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org infradead-linux-arm-kernel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox