From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, maz@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
valentin.schneider@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:24:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ade32e03-b56b-7c5d-628d-124e52279d34@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212161045.GA7475@arm.com>
Hi,
On 2/12/20 4:10 PM, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> On Wednesday 12 Feb 2020 at 11:30:44 (+0000), Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose wrote:
>>> +static int __init set_disable_amu(char *str)
>>> +{
>>> + int value = 0;
>>> +
>>> + disable_amu = get_option(&str, &value) ? !!value : true;
>> minor nit: You could simply use strtobool(str) here, which accepts:
>>
>> disable_amu= [0/1/on/off/y/n]
>>
> Yes, this was intentional as I wanted "disable_amu" to be a valid option
> as well, not only "disable_amu=<option>".
>
> If you don't mind I'd like to keep it like this. Currently the use of
> AMU is enabled by default, and the most common kernel parameter to
> disable it would be "disable_amu". Allowing "disable_amu=0" is just in
> case we change the default in the kernel to not support AMU and we'd
> like platforms to be able to enable it.
>
Sorry for jumping into thread, but can we avoid negatives into naming which
accept values? If is always tricky to get expected effect when both are combined.
If value doesn't really mater than can it be just "noamu"?
If value does matter can it be (per Suzuki) amu=[0/1/on/off/y/n]?
Or can you postpone introduction of "just in case" option till that case happens?
Cheers
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 18:45 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1 Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 11:30 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 16:10 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 16:20 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 18:20 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 19:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-02-12 20:19 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 16:24 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2020-02-12 18:27 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to AMU counters from EL0 Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 11:44 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 15:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64/kvm: disable access to AMU registers from kvm guests Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 15:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 16:33 ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] Documentation: arm64: document support for the AMU extension Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 15:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-13 11:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-13 12:59 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-13 15:22 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 18:59 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-13 9:47 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-17 16:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-23 18:49 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 9:30 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 10:32 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:01 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 10:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 10:54 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:55 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 11:43 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 11:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-14 0:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 15:45 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-14 15:57 ` Ionela Voinescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ade32e03-b56b-7c5d-628d-124e52279d34@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).