From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:58:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT In-Reply-To: References: <1403110464-29646-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20150127132127.GA869@amd> <201501271532.25540@pali> <20150127174818.GM26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150127210943.GN26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > If there is indeed a sizable following for the device then someone > should figure out how to cope with upstream kernels, either through the > installation of some intermediate bootloader that can talk FDT directly, > or via a shim layer. None of that has to be performed by nor linked > with the kernel binary, nor maintained in the kernel tree. And it's not > even that hard to do: we have precedents on other platforms with crappy > bootloaders where this just works. For reference I recommend the following threads: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kbuild.devel/10722 http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg249719.html Nicolas