From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:09:38 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for
 embedded systems
In-Reply-To: <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl>
References: <20170401222119.25106-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
 <87pogur0y9.fsf@firstfloor.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704021729470.1847@knanqh.ubzr>
 <CAHp75VdgEcyXPxENS87nHLtCEHqB5Z-1_T_W1opSiKqqNpeU2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org>
 <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704031603160.1847@knanqh.ubzr>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Adam Borowski wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:03AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really
> > rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind
> > of cleanup.
> 
> But... but... but what shall we do without OLCUC?!?
> 
> I guess sending these features to the pasture would be nice even in
> mainstream TTY.  Probably even without a Kconfig option to restore them.

Thing is... those arcane features don't take much code at all:

		if (O_OLCUC(tty))
			c = toupper(c);

That's it. I didn't make the minitty code 5x smaller just by omitting 
those.  ;-)


Nicolas