From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BE4C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8485F61040 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:16:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8485F61040 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6KM6nCx9y+MgajbtZven2fqPYJEEaHtfNJEBGNyZW6k=; b=kv8Z7TGdEqTrBsHtUgnFIAt1mG 6+XDkg+0l9jF3hVDtO/qAmnwekzos3o986olzVVHo4PJxwZBoK1SlqS8d2VP0wYR2E02Y/vhtKUw6 AnOibovcJWhDTiYTXBl/FZHqCvVYZCFfejJ4XEpcmx2wKFsSbXJoPCSzhcaCvhOM6J/EkIDpDEkkH LBuvdjhQwG6j8719pRp6kx5aYnf6xlXTWCmBdyVtErFLgQWssvt+/BIDE3ng5Z+PGUUWpFKp/6D+6 24nlFxh1xRjM21mlQcBX1Ii8kDP+f1k3PdyvW/Q/FIo07NulHWpLfxPcrrQMJ+/FJkgXjnm3i9fdh HMo5KxHQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mflaO-005R1c-NS; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:15:33 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mflaK-005R01-M8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:15:29 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.32] (unknown [47.187.212.181]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B2512034CB7; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 09:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 5B2512034CB7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1635351324; bh=DvIwhXdeH0bKthXRzPqStEFs19Q8Pn9BY0Ld8zgL3BA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=tExYXoo54lVvG2m6Ei1Z/rvIH8DX7KSn7e7FJnYb/wud1mywvbC++w632dhi1ppW7 VmHSyylStge+1aY7qGAPA8IYjhkNq+9IdEWQaGDXAeYieMmPcflbu4ksDXHhGImpNk oFhj3OlytJaJSJV9WNeVlRKtLJkkMGGC8/2+ksXE= Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] arm64: Make profile_pc() use arch_stack_walk() To: Mark Rutland Cc: broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211015025847.17694-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20211015025847.17694-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20211027133212.GG54628@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:15:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211027133212.GG54628@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211027_091528_785349_8023F521 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10/27/21 8:32 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:58:42PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" >> >> Currently, profile_pc() in ARM64 code walks the stack using >> start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Make it use arch_stack_walk() >> instead. This makes maintenance easier. >> >> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c >> @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@ >> #include >> #include >> >> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) >> +{ >> + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg; >> + >> + if (in_lock_functions(pc)) >> + return true; >> + *prof_pc = pc; >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) >> { >> - struct stackframe frame; >> + unsigned long prof_pc = 0; >> >> if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc)) >> return regs->pc; > > This can go -- the first call to profile_pc_cb() will use regs->pc. > Agreed. > With that gone, and the include updates to use : > > Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland > I will make the two changes. Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel