Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] iommu: rockchip: Add internal ops to handle variants

[Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>]

Le 21/05/2021 à 14:58, Robin Murphy a écrit :
> On 2021-05-21 09:36, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> Add internal ops to be able to handle incoming variant v2.
>> The goal is to keep the overall structure of the framework but
>> to allow to add the evolution of this hardware block.
>>
>> The ops are global for a SoC because iommu domains are not
>> attached to a specific devices if they are for a virtuel device like
>> drm. Use a global variable shouldn't be since SoC usually doesn't
>> embedded different versions of the iommu hardware block.
>> If that happen one day a WARN_ON will be displayed at probe time.
>
> IMO it would be a grievous error if such a "virtual device" ever gets 
> near the IOMMU API, so personally I wouldn't use that as a 
> justification for anything :)
>
> FWIW you should be OK to handle things on a per-instance basis, it 
> just means you have to defer some of the domain setup to .attach_dev 
> time, like various other drivers do. That said, there's nothing wrong 
> with the global if we do expect instances to be consistent across any 
> given Rockchip SoC (and my gut feeling is that we probably should).

I have tried that solution first but drm device appear to but such "virtual device" so I had to use the global.

I send a v6 to fix your others remarks.

Thanks for your advice.

Benjamin

>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> version 5:
>>   - Use of_device_get_match_data()
>>   - Add internal ops inside the driver
>>
>>   drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c 
>> b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> index 7a2932772fdf..e7b9bcf174b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/list.h>
>>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>
> This seems to be an unrelated and unnecessary change.
>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
>> @@ -96,6 +97,14 @@ static const char * const rk_iommu_clocks[] = {
>>       "aclk", "iface",
>>   };
>>   +struct rk_iommu_ops {
>> +    phys_addr_t (*pt_address)(u32 dte);
>> +    u32 (*mk_dtentries)(dma_addr_t pt_dma);
>> +    u32 (*mk_ptentries)(phys_addr_t page, int prot);
>> +    phys_addr_t (*dte_addr_phys)(phys_addr_t addr);
>> +    u32 pt_address_mask;
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct rk_iommu {
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       void __iomem **bases;
>> @@ -116,6 +125,7 @@ struct rk_iommudata {
>>   };
>>     static struct device *dma_dev;
>> +static const struct rk_iommu_ops *rk_ops;
>>     static inline void rk_table_flush(struct rk_iommu_domain *dom, 
>> dma_addr_t dma,
>>                     unsigned int count)
>> @@ -215,11 +225,6 @@ static inline u32 rk_mk_dte(dma_addr_t pt_dma)
>>   #define RK_PTE_PAGE_READABLE      BIT(1)
>>   #define RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID         BIT(0)
>>   -static inline phys_addr_t rk_pte_page_address(u32 pte)
>> -{
>> -    return (phys_addr_t)pte & RK_PTE_PAGE_ADDRESS_MASK;
>> -}
>> -
>>   static inline bool rk_pte_is_page_valid(u32 pte)
>>   {
>>       return pte & RK_PTE_PAGE_VALID;
>> @@ -451,7 +456,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_force_reset(struct rk_iommu 
>> *iommu)
>>           rk_iommu_write(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR, 
>> DTE_ADDR_DUMMY);
>>             dte_addr = rk_iommu_read(iommu->bases[i], RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR);
>> -        if (dte_addr != (DTE_ADDR_DUMMY & RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK)) {
>> +        if (dte_addr != (DTE_ADDR_DUMMY & rk_ops->pt_address_mask)) {
>
> Nit: might it make more sense to do something like:
>
>         dte_addr = rk_ops->pt_address(... DTE_ADDR_DUMMY);
>         rk_iommu_write(... dte_addr)
>         if (rk_iommu_read(...) != dte_addr)
>
> so that you don't need to bother defining ->pt_address_mask for just 
> this one sanity-check?
>
>>               dev_err(iommu->dev, "Error during raw reset. 
>> MMU_DTE_ADDR is not functioning\n");
>>               return -EFAULT;
>>           }
>> @@ -470,6 +475,11 @@ static int rk_iommu_force_reset(struct rk_iommu 
>> *iommu)
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   +static inline phys_addr_t rk_dte_addr_phys(phys_addr_t addr)
>
> The argument type here should be u32, since it's a DTE, not a physical 
> address...
>
>> +{
>> +    return addr;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void log_iova(struct rk_iommu *iommu, int index, dma_addr_t 
>> iova)
>>   {
>>       void __iomem *base = iommu->bases[index];
>> @@ -489,7 +499,7 @@ static void log_iova(struct rk_iommu *iommu, int 
>> index, dma_addr_t iova)
>>       page_offset = rk_iova_page_offset(iova);
>>         mmu_dte_addr = rk_iommu_read(base, RK_MMU_DTE_ADDR);
>> -    mmu_dte_addr_phys = (phys_addr_t)mmu_dte_addr;
>> +    mmu_dte_addr_phys = 
>> rk_ops->dte_addr_phys((phys_addr_t)mmu_dte_addr);
>
> ...and the cast here should not be here, since it *is* the conversion 
> that the called function is supposed to be performing.
>
>>       dte_addr_phys = mmu_dte_addr_phys + (4 * dte_index);
>>       dte_addr = phys_to_virt(dte_addr_phys);
>> @@ -498,14 +508,14 @@ static void log_iova(struct rk_iommu *iommu, 
>> int index, dma_addr_t iova)
>>       if (!rk_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
>>           goto print_it;
>>   -    pte_addr_phys = rk_dte_pt_address(dte) + (pte_index * 4);
>> +    pte_addr_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(dte) + (pte_index * 4);
>>       pte_addr = phys_to_virt(pte_addr_phys);
>>       pte = *pte_addr;
>>         if (!rk_pte_is_page_valid(pte))
>>           goto print_it;
>>   -    page_addr_phys = rk_pte_page_address(pte) + page_offset;
>> +    page_addr_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(pte) + page_offset;
>>       page_flags = pte & RK_PTE_PAGE_FLAGS_MASK;
>>     print_it:
>> @@ -601,13 +611,13 @@ static phys_addr_t rk_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct 
>> iommu_domain *domain,
>>       if (!rk_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
>>           goto out;
>>   -    pt_phys = rk_dte_pt_address(dte);
>> +    pt_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(dte);
>>       page_table = (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
>>       pte = page_table[rk_iova_pte_index(iova)];
>>       if (!rk_pte_is_page_valid(pte))
>>           goto out;
>>   -    phys = rk_pte_page_address(pte) + rk_iova_page_offset(iova);
>> +    phys = rk_ops->pt_address(pte) + rk_iova_page_offset(iova);
>>   out:
>>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rk_domain->dt_lock, flags);
>>   @@ -679,14 +689,14 @@ static u32 *rk_dte_get_page_table(struct 
>> rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain,
>>           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>       }
>>   -    dte = rk_mk_dte(pt_dma);
>> +    dte = rk_ops->mk_dtentries(pt_dma);
>>       *dte_addr = dte;
>>         rk_table_flush(rk_domain, pt_dma, NUM_PT_ENTRIES);
>>       rk_table_flush(rk_domain,
>>                  rk_domain->dt_dma + dte_index * sizeof(u32), 1);
>>   done:
>> -    pt_phys = rk_dte_pt_address(dte);
>> +    pt_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(dte);
>>       return (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
>>   }
>>   @@ -728,7 +738,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_map_iova(struct 
>> rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain, u32 *pte_addr,
>>           if (rk_pte_is_page_valid(pte))
>>               goto unwind;
>>   -        pte_addr[pte_count] = rk_mk_pte(paddr, prot);
>> +        pte_addr[pte_count] = rk_ops->mk_ptentries(paddr, prot);
>>             paddr += SPAGE_SIZE;
>>       }
>> @@ -750,7 +760,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_map_iova(struct 
>> rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain, u32 *pte_addr,
>>                   pte_count * SPAGE_SIZE);
>>         iova += pte_count * SPAGE_SIZE;
>> -    page_phys = rk_pte_page_address(pte_addr[pte_count]);
>> +    page_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(pte_addr[pte_count]);
>>       pr_err("iova: %pad already mapped to %pa cannot remap to phys: 
>> %pa prot: %#x\n",
>>              &iova, &page_phys, &paddr, prot);
>>   @@ -785,7 +795,8 @@ static int rk_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain 
>> *domain, unsigned long _iova,
>>       dte_index = rk_domain->dt[rk_iova_dte_index(iova)];
>>       pte_index = rk_iova_pte_index(iova);
>>       pte_addr = &page_table[pte_index];
>> -    pte_dma = rk_dte_pt_address(dte_index) + pte_index * sizeof(u32);
>> +
>> +    pte_dma = rk_ops->pt_address(dte_index) + pte_index * sizeof(u32);
>>       ret = rk_iommu_map_iova(rk_domain, pte_addr, pte_dma, iova,
>>                   paddr, size, prot);
>>   @@ -821,7 +832,7 @@ static size_t rk_iommu_unmap(struct 
>> iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long _iova,
>>           return 0;
>>       }
>>   -    pt_phys = rk_dte_pt_address(dte);
>> +    pt_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(dte);
>>       pte_addr = (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys) + rk_iova_pte_index(iova);
>>       pte_dma = pt_phys + rk_iova_pte_index(iova) * sizeof(u32);
>>       unmap_size = rk_iommu_unmap_iova(rk_domain, pte_addr, pte_dma, 
>> size);
>> @@ -1037,7 +1048,7 @@ static void rk_iommu_domain_free(struct 
>> iommu_domain *domain)
>>       for (i = 0; i < NUM_DT_ENTRIES; i++) {
>>           u32 dte = rk_domain->dt[i];
>>           if (rk_dte_is_pt_valid(dte)) {
>> -            phys_addr_t pt_phys = rk_dte_pt_address(dte);
>> +            phys_addr_t pt_phys = rk_ops->pt_address(dte);
>>               u32 *page_table = phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
>>               dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, pt_phys,
>>                        SPAGE_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> @@ -1138,6 +1149,15 @@ static int rk_iommu_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       iommu->dev = dev;
>>       iommu->num_mmu = 0;
>>   +    if (!rk_ops)
>> +        rk_ops = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * That should not happen unless different versions of the
>> +     * hardware block are embedded the same SoC
>> +     */
>> +    WARN_ON(rk_ops != of_device_get_match_data(dev));
>
> Nit: calling of_device_get_match_data() twice seems rather untidy - 
> how about something like:
>
>     ops = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>     if (!rk_ops)
>         rk_ops = ops;
>     else if (WARN_ON(rk_ops != ops))
>         return -EINVAL;
>
> Either way I think it would be good to treat unexpected inconsistentcy 
> as an actual error, rather than second-guessing the DT and carrying on 
> under the assumption the device is something other than it claimed to be.
>
>> +
>>       iommu->bases = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_res, sizeof(*iommu->bases),
>>                       GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!iommu->bases)
>> @@ -1277,10 +1297,21 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops 
>> rk_iommu_pm_ops = {
>>                   pm_runtime_force_resume)
>>   };
>>   +static struct rk_iommu_ops iommu_data_ops_v1 = {
>> +    .pt_address = &rk_dte_pt_address,
>> +    .mk_dtentries = &rk_mk_dte,
>> +    .mk_ptentries = &rk_mk_pte,
>> +    .dte_addr_phys = &rk_dte_addr_phys,
>> +    .pt_address_mask = RK_DTE_PT_ADDRESS_MASK,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct of_device_id rk_iommu_dt_ids[] = {
>> -    { .compatible = "rockchip,iommu" },
>> +    {    .compatible = "rockchip,iommu",
>> +        .data = &iommu_data_ops_v1,
>> +    },
>>       { /* sentinel */ }
>>   };
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk_iommu_dt_ids);
>
> As before, unrelated and unnecessary since this driver is still bool 
> in the Kconfig. If you do want to support modular builds you'll also 
> need to ensure rk_iommu_ops.owner is set, but do it all as a separate 
> patch please.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>>     static struct platform_driver rk_iommu_driver = {
>>       .probe = rk_iommu_probe,
>>
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel