Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] PCI: uniphier: Add misc interrupt handler to invoke PME and AER

[Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>]

Hi Marc,

On 2020/06/27 18:48, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:38:09 +0100,
> Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> The misc interrupts consisting of PME, AER, and Link event, is handled
>> by INTx handler, however, these interrupts should be also handled by
>> MSI handler.
>>
>> This adds the function uniphier_pcie_misc_isr() that handles misc
>> interrupts, which is called from both INTx and MSI handlers.
>> This function detects PME and AER interrupts with the status register,
>> and invoke PME and AER drivers related to MSI.
>>
>> And this sets the mask for misc interrupts from INTx if MSI is enabled
>> and sets the mask for misc interrupts from MSI if MSI is disabled.
>>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
>> index a5401a0..5ce2479 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
>> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
>>   #define PCL_SYS_AUX_PWR_DET		BIT(8)
>>   
>>   #define PCL_RCV_INT			0x8108
>> +#define PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_INT_MASK	GENMASK(28, 25)
>>   #define PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_ENABLE		GENMASK(20, 17)
>> +#define PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_MSI_MASK	GENMASK(12, 9)
>>   #define PCL_CFG_BW_MGT_STATUS		BIT(4)
>>   #define PCL_CFG_LINK_AUTO_BW_STATUS	BIT(3)
>>   #define PCL_CFG_AER_RC_ERR_MSI_STATUS	BIT(2)
>> @@ -167,7 +169,15 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>   
>>   static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv)
>>   {
>> -	writel(PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT);
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	val = PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_ENABLE;
>> +	if (pci_msi_enabled())
>> +		val |= PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_INT_MASK;
>> +	else
>> +		val |= PCL_RCV_INT_ALL_MSI_MASK;
> 
> Does this affect endpoints? Or just the RC itself?

These interrupts are asserted by RC itself, so this part affects only RC.

>> +
>> +	writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT);
>>   	writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -231,32 +241,56 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops uniphier_intx_domain_ops = {
>>   	.map = uniphier_pcie_intx_map,
>>   };
>>   
>> -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +static void uniphier_pcie_misc_isr(struct pcie_port *pp, bool is_msi)
>>   {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>>   	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>>   	struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
>> -	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> -	unsigned long reg;
>> -	u32 val, bit, virq;
>> +	u32 val, virq;
>>   
>> -	/* INT for debug */
>>   	val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT);
>>   
>>   	if (val & PCL_CFG_BW_MGT_STATUS)
>>   		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Link Bandwidth Management Event\n");
>> +
>>   	if (val & PCL_CFG_LINK_AUTO_BW_STATUS)
>>   		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Link Autonomous Bandwidth Event\n");
>> -	if (val & PCL_CFG_AER_RC_ERR_MSI_STATUS)
>> -		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Root Error\n");
>> -	if (val & PCL_CFG_PME_MSI_STATUS)
>> -		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "PME Interrupt\n");
>> +
>> +	if (is_msi) {
>> +		if (val & PCL_CFG_AER_RC_ERR_MSI_STATUS)
>> +			dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Root Error Status\n");
>> +
>> +		if (val & PCL_CFG_PME_MSI_STATUS)
>> +			dev_dbg(pci->dev, "PME Interrupt\n");
>> +
>> +		if (val & (PCL_CFG_AER_RC_ERR_MSI_STATUS |
>> +			   PCL_CFG_PME_MSI_STATUS)) {
>> +			virq = irq_linear_revmap(pp->irq_domain, 0);
>> +			generic_handle_irq(virq);
>> +		}
>> +	}
> 
> Please have two handlers: one for interrupts that are from the RC,
> another for interrupts coming from the endpoints.
I assume that this handler treats interrupts from the RC only and
this is set on the member ".msi_host_isr" added in the patch 1/6.
I think that the handler for interrupts coming from endpoints should be
treated as a normal case (after calling .msi_host_isr in
dw_handle_msi_irq()).

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel