linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nnet <nnet@fastmail.fm>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
	andrew@lunn.ch, luka.perkov@sartura.hr, sboyd@kernel.org,
	gregory.clement@bootlin.com, a.heider@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vladimir.vid@sartura.hr,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
	tmn505@gmail.com, gerald@gk2.net, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	kostap@marvell.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mvebu v2 00/10] Armada 37xx: Fix cpufreq changing base CPU speed to 800 MHz from 1000 MHz
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 10:30:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0b02aa0-1789-43a3-8d73-057890f703f1@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210213100139.ckrscepg72zjkj4f@pali>



On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, at 2:01 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2021 16:41:13 nnet wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hello! Could you please enable userspace governor during kernel
> > > > > > > > > compilation?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >     CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > It can be activated via command:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >     echo userspace > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > After that you can "force" CPU frequency to specific value, e.g.:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >     echo 1000000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I need to know which switch (from --> to freq) cause this system hang.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > This patch series (via MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L0_L1_1GHZ) is fixing only
> > > > > > > > > switching from 500 MHz to 1000 MHz on 1 GHz variant. As only this switch
> > > > > > > > > is causing issue.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I have used following simple bash script to check that switching between
> > > > > > > > > 500 MHz and 1 GHz is stable:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >     while true; do
> > > > > > > > >         echo 1000000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > >         echo 500000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > >         echo 1000000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > >         echo 500000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > >     done
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > echo userspace | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > > > > > > > while true; do
> > > > > > > >   echo 1200000 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > >   echo 600000 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > done
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >> +#define MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L0_L1_1GHZ 1108
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > With 1108 I get a freeze within a minute. The last output to stdout is 600000.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > With 1120 it takes a few minutes.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > With any of 1225, 1155, 1132 the device doesn't freeze over the full 5 minute load test.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'm using ondemand now with the above at 1132 without issue so far.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Great, thank you for testing!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Can you check if switching between any two lower frequencies 200000
> > > > > > > 300000 600000 is stable?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is stable using 1132 mV for MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L0_L1_1GHZ:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > while true; do
> > > > > >   # down
> > > > > >   echo 1200000 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > ...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you please re-run test without tee, in form as I have shown above?
> > > > > UART is slow and printing something to console adds delay which decrease
> > > > > probability that real issue is triggered as this is timing issue.
> > > > 
> > > > The test was done over SSH.
> > > 
> > > Ok! But it is still better to not print any results as it adds unwanted
> > > delay between frequency switching.
> > > 
> > > > > Also please do tests just between two frequencies in loop as I observed
> > > > > that switching between more decreased probability to hit issue.
> > > > 
> > > > > > > > echo userspace | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > > > > > > > while true; do
> > > > > > > >   echo 1200000 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > >   echo 600000 | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > > > > > > > done
> > > > 
> > > > The first test ^ switched between 600 MHz and 1.2 GHz.
> > > > 
> > > > > The real issue for 1 GHz variant of A3720 is only when doing switch from
> > > > > 500 MHz to 1 GHz. So could you try to do some tests also without
> > > > > changing MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L0_L1_1GHZ and switching just between non-1.2
> > > > > frequencies (to verify that on 1.2 GHz variant it is also from 600 MHz
> > > > > to 1.2 GHz)?
> > > > 
> > > > With 1108 mV and switching between 600 MHz and 1.2GHz, I always saw a freeze within a minute.
> > > 
> > > I mean to try switching with 1.108 V between 200 MHz and 300 MHz or
> > > between 300 MHz and 600 MHz. To check that issue is really only with
> > > switch from 600 MHz to 1.2 GHz.
> > 
> > With:
> > 
> > +#define MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L0_L1_1GHZ 1108
> > 
> > with 5 min load:
> > 
> > # no lock-up
> > 
> > echo userspace > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > while true; do
> >   echo 200000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> >   echo 300000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > done
> > 
> > # no lock-up
> > 
> > echo userspace > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > while true; do
> >   echo 300000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> >   echo 600000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > done
> > 
> > # lock-up with 10 seconds of load applied
> > 
> > echo userspace > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
> > while true; do
> >   echo 600000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> >   echo 1200000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/scaling_setspeed;
> > done
> 
> Ok! So it really looks like that on 1.2 GHz is the same issue. We need
> to increase voltage for L1 load (600 MHz). But question is what is the
> threshold (it is 1132 mV or lower?) 

Lower then 1132 mV causes freezes. No freezes with 1132 mV.

> and second question is what
> increasing minimal voltage may cause with board.

I don't have any further information on the issue and device then that experience.

I've tested on two of these devices which suggests it's not an oddity with one instance of it.

> 
> Basically there is absolutely no information about 1.2 GHz variant and
> this issue...
>
> > > I need to know if current settings are fine for 200, 300 and 600 MHz
> > > frequencies and the only 600 --> 1200 needs to be fixed.
> > >
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-13 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <d59ba191-43db-4b7b-b201-62a60ca752c0@www.fastmail.com>
2021-02-09 21:33 ` [PATCH mvebu v2 00/10] Armada 37xx: Fix cpufreq changing base CPU speed to 800 MHz from 1000 MHz Pali Rohár
2021-02-09 21:45   ` nnet
2021-02-09 22:42     ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-09 22:52       ` nnet
2021-02-09 22:56         ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-09 23:16           ` nnet
2021-02-09 23:26             ` Marek Behún
2021-02-10  1:31               ` nnet
2021-02-10  1:51                 ` nnet
2021-02-10  2:07                   ` nnet
2021-02-10  9:23                     ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-10 17:34                       ` nnet
2021-02-10 18:03                         ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-10 19:08                           ` nnet
2021-02-10 19:18                             ` Marek Behún
2021-02-11 19:55                             ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-11 20:22                               ` nnet
2021-02-11 23:44                                 ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-12  0:41                                   ` nnet
2021-02-13 10:01                                     ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-13 18:30                                       ` nnet [this message]
2021-02-14 12:33                                         ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-16  5:48                                           ` nnet
2021-02-16 10:41                                             ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-16 16:27                                               ` nnet
2021-02-19 19:33                                                 ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-22  3:17                                                   ` nnet
2021-02-22  9:51                                                     ` Pali Rohár
2021-02-22 16:36                                                       ` nnet
2021-02-22 16:40                                                         ` Philip Soares
2021-02-10  2:12                   ` Marek Behún
2021-01-14 12:40 Pali Rohár
2021-02-01 14:35 ` Tomasz Maciej Nowak
2021-02-03 19:29 ` Anders Trier Olesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0b02aa0-1789-43a3-8d73-057890f703f1@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=nnet@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=a.heider@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=gerald@gk2.net \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kabel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kostap@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luka.perkov@sartura.hr \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tmn505@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.vid@sartura.hr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).