From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
To: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: baolin.wang@linaro.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Some improvements for hwspinlock
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:07:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1571036463.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> (raw)
This patch set removes the BUG_ON() from hwspinlock core and changes the
PM runtime support to be optional.
Baolin Wang (4):
hwspinlock: Remove BUG_ON() from the hwspinlock core
hwspinlock: Let the PM runtime can be optional
hwspinlock: sprd: Remove redundant PM runtime implementation
hwspinlock: u8500_hsem: Remove redundant PM runtime implementation
drivers/hwspinlock/hwspinlock_core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
drivers/hwspinlock/sprd_hwspinlock.c | 21 +++------------------
drivers/hwspinlock/u8500_hsem.c | 19 ++++---------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 7:07 Baolin Wang [this message]
2019-10-14 7:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: Remove BUG_ON() from the hwspinlock core Baolin Wang
2019-10-14 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: Let the PM runtime can be optional Baolin Wang
2019-10-14 7:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: sprd: Remove redundant PM runtime implementation Baolin Wang
2019-10-14 7:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: u8500_hsem: " Baolin Wang
2019-10-16 12:55 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1571036463.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--to=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).