From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AD0C433E0 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454F2206B5 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KMx65FYp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 454F2206B5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OKW5L7cxj6eQb1J7UPnfBt3nCcAd+jVqhSO/Vd/eUmg=; b=KMx65FYpCIVckq3IHy+U90HiW c9iKqpf/N7DxC0ai5NKU/gt/Dk5dCq/6fKuulALp8I3VSsWBUgC3EpWVsrEhqXMl7cJuczw4rHqxt MLKiNsXYl1YVJjKvJJFtyJJ1HYbHB3F0AysWMZRpm77cXLZSCOnXHJCDCCWv2myiA+AZx6yBxLj9E 2UMxL1ICJ2boYg+d01EcLVqPA+UZ7QZ2TrGOkiDfsA8avmmepSQPDIrWCthRWYWEPhzIVdoVQdY1K gnczUqUG0JzqZt/zvNtSndujMXm+6+kGT3NI1mSmIt6cuSZ9bRUyZXMK+DI5evAl6fvB2GjyI/QgF OqNgSfebw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5fFZ-0000zA-Ew; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:08:17 +0000 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k5fFW-0000x3-VX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 01:08:15 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D453732FD42127E7D3BA; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:08:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.86] (10.174.178.86) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:07:44 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] huge vmalloc mappings To: Jonathan Cameron , Nicholas Piggin References: <20200810022732.1150009-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200811173217.0000161e@huawei.com> From: Zefan Li Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:07:44 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200811173217.0000161e@huawei.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.86] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200811_210815_259946_3F5C03D5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Will Deacon , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2020/8/12 0:32, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:27:24 +1000 > Nicholas Piggin wrote: > >> Not tested on x86 or arm64, would appreciate a quick test there so I can >> ask Andrew to put it in -mm. Other option is I can disable huge vmallocs >> for them for the time being. > > Hi Nicholas, > > For arm64 testing with a Kunpeng920. > > I ran a quick sanity test with this series on top of mainline (yes mid merge window > so who knows what state is...). Could I be missing some dependency? > > Without them it boots, with them it doesn't. Any immediate guesses? > I've already reported this bug in v2, and yeah I also tested it on arm64 (not Kunpeng though), so looks like it still hasn't been fixed. ... >> >> Since v2: >> - Rebased on vmalloc cleanups, split series into simpler pieces. >> - Fixed several compile errors and warnings >> - Keep the page array and accounting in small page units because >> struct vm_struct is an interface (this should fix x86 vmap stack debug >> assert). [Thanks Zefan] though the changelog says it's fixed for x86. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel