linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/24] kvm: arm64: Create nVHE copy of cpu_logical_map
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 15:24:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d473fd26e5314f2407b70242488f33de@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109113233.9012-8-dbrazdil@google.com>

On 2020-11-09 11:32, David Brazdil wrote:
> When KVM starts validating host's PSCI requests, it will need to map
> MPIDR back to the CPU ID. To this end, copy cpu_logical_map into nVHE
> hyp memory when KVM is initialized.
> 
> Only copy the information for CPUs that are online at the point of KVM
> initialization so that KVM rejects CPUs whose features were not checked
> against the finalized capabilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c             | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/percpu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 9ba9db2aa7f8..b85b4294b72d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1481,6 +1481,21 @@ static inline void hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void)
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> +static void init_cpu_logical_map(void)
> +{
> +	extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(__cpu_logical_map)[NR_CPUS];
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Copy the MPIDR <-> logical CPU ID mapping to hyp.
> +	 * Only copy the set of online CPUs whose features have been chacked
> +	 * against the finalized system capabilities. The hypervisor will not
> +	 * allow any other CPUs from the `possible` set to boot.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> +		CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__cpu_logical_map)[cpu] = cpu_logical_map(cpu);
> +}
> +
>  static int init_common_resources(void)
>  {
>  	return kvm_set_ipa_limit();
> @@ -1659,6 +1674,8 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
>  		}
>  	}
> 
> +	init_cpu_logical_map();
> +
>  	return 0;
> 
>  out_err:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/percpu.c 
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/percpu.c
> index 5fd0c5696907..d0b9dbc2df45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/percpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/percpu.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,22 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> 
> +/*
> + * nVHE copy of data structures tracking available CPU cores.
> + * Only entries for CPUs that were online at KVM init are populated.
> + * Other CPUs should not be allowed to boot because their features 
> were
> + * not checked against the finalized system capabilities.
> + */
> +u64 __ro_after_init __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1]
> = INVALID_HWID };

I'm not sure what __ro_after_init means once we get S2 isolation.

> +
> +u64 cpu_logical_map(int cpu)

nit: is there any reason why "cpu" cannot be unsigned? The thought
of a negative CPU number makes me shiver...

> +{
> +	if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= ARRAY_SIZE(__cpu_logical_map))
> +		hyp_panic();
> +
> +	return __cpu_logical_map[cpu];
> +}
> +
>  unsigned long __hyp_per_cpu_offset(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *cpu_base_array;

Overall, this patch would make more sense closer it its use case
(in patch 19). I also don't understand why this lives in percpu.c...

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-09 11:32 [PATCH v1 00/24] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 01/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI version David Brazdil
2020-11-10 14:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-11 11:31     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/24] arm64: Move MAIR_EL1_SET to asm/memory.h David Brazdil
2020-11-10 14:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 04/24] kvm: arm64: Initialize MAIR_EL2 using a constant David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 05/24] kvm: arm64: Add .hyp.data..ro_after_init ELF section David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 06/24] kvm: arm64: Support per_cpu_ptr in nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-10 15:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-11 12:32     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-11 12:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 07/24] kvm: arm64: Create nVHE copy of cpu_logical_map David Brazdil
2020-11-10 15:24   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-11 13:03     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-11 13:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-11 13:45         ` David Brazdil
2020-11-11 13:52           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 08/24] kvm: arm64: Move hyp-init params to a per-CPU struct David Brazdil
2020-11-10 15:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 09/24] kvm: arm64: Refactor handle_trap to use a switch David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 10/24] kvm: arm64: Extract parts of el2_setup into a macro David Brazdil
2020-11-10 15:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 17:56     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 11/24] kvm: arm64: Add SMC handler in nVHE EL2 David Brazdil
2020-11-11 12:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 12/24] kvm: arm64: Extract __do_hyp_init into a helper function David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 13/24] kvm: arm64: Add CPU entry point in nVHE hyp David Brazdil
2020-11-11 11:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-16 11:49     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-16 12:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 14/24] kvm: arm64: Add function to enter host from KVM nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 15/24] kvm: arm64: Bootstrap PSCI SMC handler in nVHE EL2 David Brazdil
2020-11-11 13:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 16/24] kvm: arm64: Add offset for hyp VA <-> PA conversion David Brazdil
2020-11-11 13:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 17/24] kvm: arm64: Add __hyp_pa_symbol helper macro David Brazdil
2020-11-09 16:59   ` Quentin Perret
2020-11-09 18:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10  9:24       ` David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 18/24] kvm: arm64: Forward safe PSCI SMCs coming from host David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 19/24] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's PSCI_CPU_ON SMCs David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 20/24] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's CPU_SUSPEND PSCI SMCs David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 21/24] kvm: arm64: Add kvm-arm.protected early kernel parameter David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 22/24] kvm: arm64: Keep nVHE EL2 vector installed David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 23/24] kvm: arm64: Trap host SMCs in protected mode David Brazdil
2020-11-10  5:02   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-10  9:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-10 13:00     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v1 24/24] kvm: arm64: Fix EL2 mode availability checks David Brazdil
2020-11-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v1 00/24] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-10 11:18   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-01-19 13:17     ` Janne Karhunen
2020-11-11 14:32 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d473fd26e5314f2407b70242488f33de@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=ascull@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).